Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Mercurius" data-source="post: 5769101" data-attributes="member: 59082">It has become clear that you aren't comprehending what I've been saying to you. First, I said that I don't feel like I know C&amp;C (or the other two games you mentioned) well enough to make that judgment, so why is it &quot;puzzling&quot; that I won't give you the kind of answer that you want? I own Pathfinder and have at least perused its contents, whereas I've only read about C&amp;C and seen the books in stores. I don't know Pathfinder well enough to definitely state how similar it is to 3.5, but my sense is that it is very similar, far more similar than 4E is, and essentially equivalent to a &quot;3.75E&quot;. But again, you're simply not getting the multiple contexts/perspectives/definitions thing. Pathfinder is not D&amp;D in my 2nd view, but it is in category 1 (for me), 3 and 4. From what I know of C&amp;C, it is pretty similar in that regard.Satisfied?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Mercurius, post: 5769101, member: 59082"] It has become clear that you aren't comprehending what I've been saying to you. First, I said that I don't feel like I know C&C (or the other two games you mentioned) well enough to make that judgment, so why is it "puzzling" that I won't give you the kind of answer that you want? I own Pathfinder and have at least perused its contents, whereas I've only read about C&C and seen the books in stores. I don't know Pathfinder well enough to definitely state how similar it is to 3.5, but my sense is that it is very similar, far more similar than 4E is, and essentially equivalent to a "3.75E". But again, you're simply not getting the multiple contexts/perspectives/definitions thing. Pathfinder is [I]not [/I]D&D in my 2nd view, but it [I]is [/I]in category 1 (for me), 3 and 4. From what I know of C&C, it is pretty similar in that regard. Satisfied? [/QUOTE]

Verification