Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="BobTheNob" data-source="post: 5972524" data-attributes="member: 82425">Piping in late my issue with your position is...Well, for a while now (decades really) I have been looking at D&amp;D and I came to a number of core conclussions about it. Things I just didnt like. I look at all the editions and think &quot;Nah, aspect A bugged me&quot; and another edition and think &quot;aspect B bugged me&quot;.Now if I was looking at the list in its entirety, the funny thing is, alot of the things that I dislike have already been mentioned as part of the design goals of 5e. So my problem with the article is that (drum role) 5e sounds like the edition Im looking for, and what your actually saying is because others like previous editions, I shouldnt have 5e. (or at least, thats the impression I got).So maybe WOTC shouldn't be saying 5e is the edition to unite all, but that doesnt exclude it from being a happy member of the edition community.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="BobTheNob, post: 5972524, member: 82425"] Piping in late my issue with your position is... Well, for a while now (decades really) I have been looking at D&D and I came to a number of core conclussions about it. Things I just didnt like. I look at all the editions and think "Nah, aspect A bugged me" and another edition and think "aspect B bugged me". Now if I was looking at the list in its entirety, the funny thing is, alot of the things that I dislike have already been mentioned as part of the design goals of 5e. So my problem with the article is that (drum role) 5e sounds like the edition Im looking for, and what your actually saying is because others like previous editions, I shouldnt have 5e. (or at least, thats the impression I got). So maybe WOTC shouldn't be saying 5e is the edition to unite all, but that doesnt exclude it from being a happy member of the edition community. [/QUOTE]

Verification