Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="clearstream" data-source="post: 9240511" data-attributes="member: 71699">In that vein, I wonder if we do ourselves a disservice by (re)describing GMing as anything other than GMing? It is for example unconfusing that a referee referees. In the same vein, a GM GMs. One may then develop a vocabulary around GMing, and if wanted an internal-taxonomy.I think I see what you mean. The bolded instance of trad should have been something like "-trad" as I intended to refer to the same set of enduring modes of play that I'd characterised as traditional and grouped into the -trad of neotrad. Thereby pointing to the opportunity I perceived to make it a neotrad design. Hardly at all confusing: I'm shocked to learn you had trouble following it.That makes better sense to me, now that you've explained it.I would suggest instead that it makes it hard to definitely say what counts as "good faith play".</blockquote>