Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
A new fighter at-will for marking multiple targets
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kzach" data-source="post: 4418284" data-attributes="member: 56189"><p>The thing that makes me think this is too powerful is that I'm playing a fighter at the moment, and I would use this as my primary attack power. In fact, I think it's a no-brainer to use as the primary attack power. The rest of the at-wills are circumstantial, whereas a fighter is almost always going to have more than one target to mark.</p><p></p><p>This essentially assures that the fighter can stick two opponents to him, constantly.</p><p></p><p>Any time I find something that to me is a no-brainer to use, I immediately feel it's imbalanced.</p><p></p><p>Not only that, but for humans, I'd swap out Reaping Strike for my fighter for this in an instant. Reaping Strike and Sure Strike are meant for 2H fighters, Tide of Iron and Cleave for sword & board. There's a certain balance to that. My sword & board fighter isn't really any better off with Reaping Strike or Sure Strike as his third at-will, but is significantly better off with Sweeping Assault.</p><p></p><p>Limiting it to 1 adjacent opponent instead of having it scale with wisdom makes it a little better, but even then I'd totally have this over either Cleave or Tide of Iron if I had to choose.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kzach, post: 4418284, member: 56189"] The thing that makes me think this is too powerful is that I'm playing a fighter at the moment, and I would use this as my primary attack power. In fact, I think it's a no-brainer to use as the primary attack power. The rest of the at-wills are circumstantial, whereas a fighter is almost always going to have more than one target to mark. This essentially assures that the fighter can stick two opponents to him, constantly. Any time I find something that to me is a no-brainer to use, I immediately feel it's imbalanced. Not only that, but for humans, I'd swap out Reaping Strike for my fighter for this in an instant. Reaping Strike and Sure Strike are meant for 2H fighters, Tide of Iron and Cleave for sword & board. There's a certain balance to that. My sword & board fighter isn't really any better off with Reaping Strike or Sure Strike as his third at-will, but is significantly better off with Sweeping Assault. Limiting it to 1 adjacent opponent instead of having it scale with wisdom makes it a little better, but even then I'd totally have this over either Cleave or Tide of Iron if I had to choose. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
A new fighter at-will for marking multiple targets
Top