Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
A new take on Mana casting.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DogBackward" data-source="post: 3446127" data-attributes="member: 50642"><p>Monte Cook has an article I just read (linked from another thread), which got me thinking. Admittedly, I only got about halfway through it before inspiration struck, but I thought I'd pop in and see what other people thought of it.</p><p></p><p>The article is <a href="http://www.montecook.com/cgi-bin/page.cgi?otherd20_Spellcasters" target="_blank">here</a>.</p><p></p><p>My idea is rather simple. Like Monte said, there are certain spells that are both simple enough and ubiquitous enough that they really don't need to be limited to "I can do this once and it's gone." It wouldn't hurt balance to have them be available more often, even at will.</p><p></p><p>I've been working, on and off, on a mana-based magic system for a year or so now, and this article kinda spurred me on with a new idea. Spells could be given two designations: Simple and Complex. You would have a mana pool, based on caster level and your primary ability score. This mana pool would regenerate at the rate of 1/round, as long as you don't cast a spell in that round.</p><p></p><p>Simple spells use one mana per caster level, possibly using the psionics method of augmentation. So, you could sit here and use simple spells over and over again without doing much more than waiting a few rounds in between.</p><p></p><p>Complex spells, however, only use one mana per spell level, and are more powerful or more useful, whatever. The drawback, however, is that using a Complex spell drains your mana for good. Mana spent to cast a complex spell does not return at the normal 1/round rate, but refreshes after you get your 8 hours of rest, like normal spells.</p><p></p><p>This would serve to make sure that casters are always usefull, throughout the day. It will also serve to keep things balanced, as you can't just go off and use all of your best spells at will. And you still have to pay attention to resources. Even though you can use your Simple spells all day without worry, if you spend all your mana on Complex spells, you won't be able to use those Simple spells anymore, since they both draw from the same pool.</p><p></p><p>So, what do you all think about that? I think I'll probably run with it, see how well it works out, though I'm not sure I'd be up to seperating all the spells into Simple/Complex. I'll damn well give it a try, though...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DogBackward, post: 3446127, member: 50642"] Monte Cook has an article I just read (linked from another thread), which got me thinking. Admittedly, I only got about halfway through it before inspiration struck, but I thought I'd pop in and see what other people thought of it. The article is [URL=http://www.montecook.com/cgi-bin/page.cgi?otherd20_Spellcasters]here[/URL]. My idea is rather simple. Like Monte said, there are certain spells that are both simple enough and ubiquitous enough that they really don't need to be limited to "I can do this once and it's gone." It wouldn't hurt balance to have them be available more often, even at will. I've been working, on and off, on a mana-based magic system for a year or so now, and this article kinda spurred me on with a new idea. Spells could be given two designations: Simple and Complex. You would have a mana pool, based on caster level and your primary ability score. This mana pool would regenerate at the rate of 1/round, as long as you don't cast a spell in that round. Simple spells use one mana per caster level, possibly using the psionics method of augmentation. So, you could sit here and use simple spells over and over again without doing much more than waiting a few rounds in between. Complex spells, however, only use one mana per spell level, and are more powerful or more useful, whatever. The drawback, however, is that using a Complex spell drains your mana for good. Mana spent to cast a complex spell does not return at the normal 1/round rate, but refreshes after you get your 8 hours of rest, like normal spells. This would serve to make sure that casters are always usefull, throughout the day. It will also serve to keep things balanced, as you can't just go off and use all of your best spells at will. And you still have to pay attention to resources. Even though you can use your Simple spells all day without worry, if you spend all your mana on Complex spells, you won't be able to use those Simple spells anymore, since they both draw from the same pool. So, what do you all think about that? I think I'll probably run with it, see how well it works out, though I'm not sure I'd be up to seperating all the spells into Simple/Complex. I'll damn well give it a try, though... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
A new take on Mana casting.
Top