Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
A new toughness varient
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="fba827" data-source="post: 564619" data-attributes="member: 807"><p>Hmmm...</p><p></p><p>Since these seems to be the 1001 Possible House Rule varients for Toughness (I say that in jest), I'll add some possibilities...</p><p></p><p>(Think we're on varient number 7 now, but feel free to ignore my numbering if we're on some other number)</p><p></p><p><strong>Toughness varient 7</strong></p><p>Benefit: For the purposes of determining hit points, your Constitution score is considered to be increased by 1. No other benefits from an increased constitution are derived from this feat.</p><p></p><p><em>Weaker than the +1 per level (since only odd-numbered Con folks would benefit) and the wording (that it gives a static effect to Con rather than a dynamic effect to hit points) makes it circumvent the issue about how feats are (supposedly) supposed to be static gained abilities. But still more useful than the PHB version since it will scale with level.</em></p><p></p><p><strong>Toughness varient 8</strong></p><p>Benefit: For the purposes of determining hit points, your Constitution score is considered to be increased by 2. No other benefits from an increased constitution are derived from this feat.</p><p></p><p><em>The net effect of this would be a +1 hp per level but the wording helps by-pass the rule bending of feat definition that would be bent by explicitly saying +1hp/level.</em></p><p></p><p><strong>Toughness varient 9</strong></p><p>Benefit: You are unnaturally tough. You are considered to have a +1 natural armor bonus to represent the toughness.</p><p></p><p><em>Hmm - adding a bonus to AC is more powerful than adding hitpoints. But it's just one AC ... dunno. Better than dodge, but (which may be a little lacking but is a prerequ. t a whole lot of feat chains which keeps dodge as valuable if not more valuable depending on how much you value those various feat chains). It does loose some appeal at higher levels when people may get magic items, or other, that allows then a natural armor bonus thus, by those levels since the bonuses would not stack, the feat goes by the way side ( -- though, that leads to possibility 10, below)</em></p><p></p><p><strong>Toughness varient 10</strong></p><p>Benefit: You are unnaturally tough. Your body's natural armor is considered one higher than normal. Thus, if you have a +0 natural armor, you now have +1. If you have a +1 natural armor, you now have a +2, etc. </p><p></p><p><em>This sort of follows the idea for familiars that have their natural armor increased over levels. Overall though, I don't think I like this. It takes all the goodness of 9 and then makes it even better.. seems like too much to me, but am mentioning it none the less.</em></p><p></p><p>I think each of these would be equally valuable to any character class combination and each remains (more or less) just as valuable at any given level (though 9 does loose some appeal at higher levels, see above).</p><p></p><p>Mind you, I am on cold medicine right now and only _just_ thought of these. I have yet to actually think about any of them -- so consider the above just random ramblings of someone on medication ;-)</p><p></p><p>Oh, and I'm not saying any other mentioned suggestions are good or bad.. just know with the cold medicine I wouldn't be comprehending them as well as I could otherwise. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="fba827, post: 564619, member: 807"] Hmmm... Since these seems to be the 1001 Possible House Rule varients for Toughness (I say that in jest), I'll add some possibilities... (Think we're on varient number 7 now, but feel free to ignore my numbering if we're on some other number) [b]Toughness varient 7[/b] Benefit: For the purposes of determining hit points, your Constitution score is considered to be increased by 1. No other benefits from an increased constitution are derived from this feat. [i]Weaker than the +1 per level (since only odd-numbered Con folks would benefit) and the wording (that it gives a static effect to Con rather than a dynamic effect to hit points) makes it circumvent the issue about how feats are (supposedly) supposed to be static gained abilities. But still more useful than the PHB version since it will scale with level.[/i] [b]Toughness varient 8[/b] Benefit: For the purposes of determining hit points, your Constitution score is considered to be increased by 2. No other benefits from an increased constitution are derived from this feat. [i]The net effect of this would be a +1 hp per level but the wording helps by-pass the rule bending of feat definition that would be bent by explicitly saying +1hp/level.[/i] [b]Toughness varient 9[/b] Benefit: You are unnaturally tough. You are considered to have a +1 natural armor bonus to represent the toughness. [i]Hmm - adding a bonus to AC is more powerful than adding hitpoints. But it's just one AC ... dunno. Better than dodge, but (which may be a little lacking but is a prerequ. t a whole lot of feat chains which keeps dodge as valuable if not more valuable depending on how much you value those various feat chains). It does loose some appeal at higher levels when people may get magic items, or other, that allows then a natural armor bonus thus, by those levels since the bonuses would not stack, the feat goes by the way side ( -- though, that leads to possibility 10, below)[/i] [b]Toughness varient 10[/b] Benefit: You are unnaturally tough. Your body's natural armor is considered one higher than normal. Thus, if you have a +0 natural armor, you now have +1. If you have a +1 natural armor, you now have a +2, etc. [i]This sort of follows the idea for familiars that have their natural armor increased over levels. Overall though, I don't think I like this. It takes all the goodness of 9 and then makes it even better.. seems like too much to me, but am mentioning it none the less.[/i] I think each of these would be equally valuable to any character class combination and each remains (more or less) just as valuable at any given level (though 9 does loose some appeal at higher levels, see above). Mind you, I am on cold medicine right now and only _just_ thought of these. I have yet to actually think about any of them -- so consider the above just random ramblings of someone on medication ;-) Oh, and I'm not saying any other mentioned suggestions are good or bad.. just know with the cold medicine I wouldn't be comprehending them as well as I could otherwise. :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
A new toughness varient
Top