Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
A percent chance of getting AOO instead of automatic
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Stalker0" data-source="post: 697853" data-attributes="member: 5889"><p>One thing I've never liked about AOO, is that they are automatic. You do A, you get B punishment. That doesn't really fly with me when you think of dueling and such, sure trying to disarm your opponent leave you a bit more open, but the opponent doesn't get a chance to capitalize EVERY time you do it. </p><p></p><p>So I was thinking, why not assign a percentage to each action that provokes AOO. For instace, leave movement at 100%, it would get too complex otherwise.</p><p></p><p>Disarm could have a 75% of so chance, grappling like 50%, tripping could have a 20% chance (I'm just throwing numbers out there). You could then make feats that would allow you to increase the percentage or decrease it. For example improved disarm could decrease the percentage by x amount, that way there's still a risk for that as well.</p><p></p><p>Benefits:</p><p>1) People might use complex combat moves more often since there's a chance of getting away with it clean.</p><p></p><p>2) Those moves become more interesting. At high levels of combat, when the first attack is a guarranteed miss, then trying a combat maneuver practically means you take damage. With percents, that doesn't always happens, so there's the tension of seeing if you take an AOO or not.</p><p></p><p>3) It helps to curb the AOO cycle, where one AOO uses a move that provoke an AOO etc.</p><p></p><p>Drawbacks:</p><p></p><p>1) More dice rolling, slows down combat.</p><p></p><p>2) May make certain combat moves too powerful.</p><p></p><p></p><p>What do you all think?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Stalker0, post: 697853, member: 5889"] One thing I've never liked about AOO, is that they are automatic. You do A, you get B punishment. That doesn't really fly with me when you think of dueling and such, sure trying to disarm your opponent leave you a bit more open, but the opponent doesn't get a chance to capitalize EVERY time you do it. So I was thinking, why not assign a percentage to each action that provokes AOO. For instace, leave movement at 100%, it would get too complex otherwise. Disarm could have a 75% of so chance, grappling like 50%, tripping could have a 20% chance (I'm just throwing numbers out there). You could then make feats that would allow you to increase the percentage or decrease it. For example improved disarm could decrease the percentage by x amount, that way there's still a risk for that as well. Benefits: 1) People might use complex combat moves more often since there's a chance of getting away with it clean. 2) Those moves become more interesting. At high levels of combat, when the first attack is a guarranteed miss, then trying a combat maneuver practically means you take damage. With percents, that doesn't always happens, so there's the tension of seeing if you take an AOO or not. 3) It helps to curb the AOO cycle, where one AOO uses a move that provoke an AOO etc. Drawbacks: 1) More dice rolling, slows down combat. 2) May make certain combat moves too powerful. What do you all think? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
A percent chance of getting AOO instead of automatic
Top