Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
A pseudo-scientific explanation of magic
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Desdichado" data-source="post: 2337061" data-attributes="member: 2205"><p>Not limited to D&D style magic; let me just say that up front.</p><p></p><p>Lately, I've become increasingly keen on settings that blend fantasy conventions with science fiction trappings, or vice versa. I've been working off and on for a couple of years now on a setting that's got a lot of steampunk-like influence, complete with some alternate technology. Mk. I of the setting was slightly more realistic, with Mk. II (which I've actually been running for a while now) being more overtly fantastic with floating islands and all that jazz. Mk. III, which is percolating in the back of my head, and starting to come out in big chunks like a bucket of chunder goes back to a much less overtly fantastic vision, and one that owes more to science fiction.</p><p></p><p>Yet, it has magic, and I couldn't really do the setting without magic. I'm not using D&D magic -- something more like <em>Midnight</em> or <em>Call of Cthulhu</em> would be my preferred mechanics. The thing is, I have little use for the "it's magic" handwave, and I'd ideally like to have some kind of explanation for my magic, where it comes from, and all that.</p><p></p><p>I've had an idea, thanks to my hobbyist research into advanced string theory and M-theory, but I'd like to toss it out for comments; I'm sure it can be improved upon. Here's the 50¢ background; if you want more, wikipedia is more detailed looking up M-theory or brane cosmology, and <em>Parallel Universes</em> by Michio Kaku is a book just published less than six months ago that is pretty up-to-date, well-written, and informative. <a href="http://cosmos.phy.tufts.edu/~zirbel/ast21/sciam/cosmos.pdf" target="_blank">This link</a> is also pretty comprehensive and informative.</p><p></p><p>Essentially the 4-dimensional universe we know and observe has some cosmological problems that lead to the formulation of the theory. And I'm only hitting on the relevent points here; but for many years now, we've suspected from astronomical observations that the visible matter compared to the dark matter -- unknown matter of some kind that surrounds galactic halos and other areas, is a small proportion. What is even more interesting and strange is that despite earlier beliefs that dark matter balanced the expansion of the universe, leading to a "flat" cosmos, what more recent observations seem to be suggesting is that actually the acceleration of the expansion of the universe is increasing at a runaway pace. The explanation for this is some kind of dark energy that makes up 70% of the universe (remember that mass and energy are interchangeable via the famous e=mc[sup]2[/sup].) Nobody really knows what this dark energy is, or where it comes from, or why it seems to be counteracting gravity. It seems to be the energy of emptiness, and why it is such an important factor in the eventual fate of the universe is completely baffling to cosmologists.</p><p></p><p>Now, let's turn our attention briefly to the Grand Unifying Theory -- the holy grail of physicists when I was a teenager. Some theory that united the strong and weak nuclear forces with electromagnetism and gravity. Brane cosmology has partially helped to do this; essentially it states that the 4-dimensional universe that we know is actually one part of a higher multidimensional whole that is sometimes called the bulk. Our universe is a brane (a contraction of membrane) in this bulk, and other branes may well have other 4-dimensional "universes" on them, some even with different physical properties. While string theory helped to unite the nuclear forces and electromagnetism, gravity was still a stranger, in particular why it was so relatively weak. M-theory and brane cosmology explain this by saying that some of the force of gravity is "leaked" into the bulk, or perhaps to another brane in the bulk. Interactions such as this between branes, or with the bulk itself can have impacts on our own universe, including (possibly) where dark energy comes from, where the runaway acceleration comes from, and whether or not that runaway acceleration will continue, or change or what have you.</p><p></p><p>Using extremely complex mathematical formulae (and maybe some kind of focus or device of some type?) it seems reasonably pseudo-scientific that effects that are similar to "magic" could be had by those who were aware of this cross-brane energy source and how to manipulate it. And <em>voila!</em> I've concocted a pseudo-scientific explanation for how magic (at least of some kind) could exist in a setting that is otherwise leaning much more towards sci-fi than traditional fantasy.</p><p></p><p>Any comments or helpful suggestions?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Desdichado, post: 2337061, member: 2205"] Not limited to D&D style magic; let me just say that up front. Lately, I've become increasingly keen on settings that blend fantasy conventions with science fiction trappings, or vice versa. I've been working off and on for a couple of years now on a setting that's got a lot of steampunk-like influence, complete with some alternate technology. Mk. I of the setting was slightly more realistic, with Mk. II (which I've actually been running for a while now) being more overtly fantastic with floating islands and all that jazz. Mk. III, which is percolating in the back of my head, and starting to come out in big chunks like a bucket of chunder goes back to a much less overtly fantastic vision, and one that owes more to science fiction. Yet, it has magic, and I couldn't really do the setting without magic. I'm not using D&D magic -- something more like [i]Midnight[/i] or [i]Call of Cthulhu[/i] would be my preferred mechanics. The thing is, I have little use for the "it's magic" handwave, and I'd ideally like to have some kind of explanation for my magic, where it comes from, and all that. I've had an idea, thanks to my hobbyist research into advanced string theory and M-theory, but I'd like to toss it out for comments; I'm sure it can be improved upon. Here's the 50¢ background; if you want more, wikipedia is more detailed looking up M-theory or brane cosmology, and [i]Parallel Universes[/i] by Michio Kaku is a book just published less than six months ago that is pretty up-to-date, well-written, and informative. [url=http://cosmos.phy.tufts.edu/~zirbel/ast21/sciam/cosmos.pdf]This link[/url] is also pretty comprehensive and informative. Essentially the 4-dimensional universe we know and observe has some cosmological problems that lead to the formulation of the theory. And I'm only hitting on the relevent points here; but for many years now, we've suspected from astronomical observations that the visible matter compared to the dark matter -- unknown matter of some kind that surrounds galactic halos and other areas, is a small proportion. What is even more interesting and strange is that despite earlier beliefs that dark matter balanced the expansion of the universe, leading to a "flat" cosmos, what more recent observations seem to be suggesting is that actually the acceleration of the expansion of the universe is increasing at a runaway pace. The explanation for this is some kind of dark energy that makes up 70% of the universe (remember that mass and energy are interchangeable via the famous e=mc[sup]2[/sup].) Nobody really knows what this dark energy is, or where it comes from, or why it seems to be counteracting gravity. It seems to be the energy of emptiness, and why it is such an important factor in the eventual fate of the universe is completely baffling to cosmologists. Now, let's turn our attention briefly to the Grand Unifying Theory -- the holy grail of physicists when I was a teenager. Some theory that united the strong and weak nuclear forces with electromagnetism and gravity. Brane cosmology has partially helped to do this; essentially it states that the 4-dimensional universe that we know is actually one part of a higher multidimensional whole that is sometimes called the bulk. Our universe is a brane (a contraction of membrane) in this bulk, and other branes may well have other 4-dimensional "universes" on them, some even with different physical properties. While string theory helped to unite the nuclear forces and electromagnetism, gravity was still a stranger, in particular why it was so relatively weak. M-theory and brane cosmology explain this by saying that some of the force of gravity is "leaked" into the bulk, or perhaps to another brane in the bulk. Interactions such as this between branes, or with the bulk itself can have impacts on our own universe, including (possibly) where dark energy comes from, where the runaway acceleration comes from, and whether or not that runaway acceleration will continue, or change or what have you. Using extremely complex mathematical formulae (and maybe some kind of focus or device of some type?) it seems reasonably pseudo-scientific that effects that are similar to "magic" could be had by those who were aware of this cross-brane energy source and how to manipulate it. And [i]voila![/i] I've concocted a pseudo-scientific explanation for how magic (at least of some kind) could exist in a setting that is otherwise leaning much more towards sci-fi than traditional fantasy. Any comments or helpful suggestions? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
A pseudo-scientific explanation of magic
Top