Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
A Question Of Agency?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pemerton" data-source="post: 8134373" data-attributes="member: 42582"><p>My feeling about this is that something more important would be going on: If I present a situation to the players, and they don't engage it with their PCs, I feel that <em>something has gone wrong at that point</em> ie my idea was meant to be interesting, but it turns out that it wasn't!</p><p></p><p>I wouldn't worry about what happens to the fictional stuff I thought up that no one else at the table seemed interest in. I would try and come up with something that sparked more interest! If, down the track, in narrating some consequence or presenting some new situation it seemed worthwhile to pick up some aspect of my earlier idea that fell flat, well I might do that. At that point I might think about possible in-fiction pathways from <em>then </em>to <em>now</em>, if they seemed relevant.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I'm not questioning your belief. But a game played in accordance with that belief will be one with relatively low player agency, because the players have no way to "lock in" outcomes.</p><p></p><p>Here's a contrast, taken from Dungeon World (p 68):</p><p></p><p style="margin-left: 20px"><u>Discern Realities</u></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">When you closely study a situation or person, roll+Wis. ✴On a 10+, ask the GM 3 questions from the list below. ✴On a 7–9, ask 1. Either way, take +1 forward when acting on the answers.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">• What happened here recently?</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">• What is about to happen?</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">• What should I be on the lookout for?</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">• What here is useful or valuable to me?</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">• Who’s really in control here?</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">• What here is not what it appears to be?</p><p></p><p>The GM is not free, if the player succeeds at this move, to make subsequent unfettered decisions about how the world reacts. Eg if the player ask <em>who is really in control here?</em> or <em>what here is useful or valuable to me?</em>, then the GM has to stick to the answer given. If the GM decides that Pup is in control, and then the player(s) (via their PCs) bring Pup around to their side, the GM isn't at liberty just to decide that now Pup's followers change their minds about their allegiance to Pup!</p><p></p><p>This is just one illustration of how robust action declaration can be a mechanism for players exercising agency over the shared fiction.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pemerton, post: 8134373, member: 42582"] My feeling about this is that something more important would be going on: If I present a situation to the players, and they don't engage it with their PCs, I feel that [I]something has gone wrong at that point[/I] ie my idea was meant to be interesting, but it turns out that it wasn't! I wouldn't worry about what happens to the fictional stuff I thought up that no one else at the table seemed interest in. I would try and come up with something that sparked more interest! If, down the track, in narrating some consequence or presenting some new situation it seemed worthwhile to pick up some aspect of my earlier idea that fell flat, well I might do that. At that point I might think about possible in-fiction pathways from [I]then [/I]to [I]now[/I], if they seemed relevant. I'm not questioning your belief. But a game played in accordance with that belief will be one with relatively low player agency, because the players have no way to "lock in" outcomes. Here's a contrast, taken from Dungeon World (p 68): [INDENT][U]Discern Realities[/U][/INDENT] [INDENT]When you closely study a situation or person, roll+Wis. ✴On a 10+, ask the GM 3 questions from the list below. ✴On a 7–9, ask 1. Either way, take +1 forward when acting on the answers.[/INDENT] [INDENT]• What happened here recently?[/INDENT] [INDENT]• What is about to happen?[/INDENT] [INDENT]• What should I be on the lookout for?[/INDENT] [INDENT]• What here is useful or valuable to me?[/INDENT] [INDENT]• Who’s really in control here?[/INDENT] [INDENT]• What here is not what it appears to be?[/INDENT] The GM is not free, if the player succeeds at this move, to make subsequent unfettered decisions about how the world reacts. Eg if the player ask [I]who is really in control here?[/I] or [I]what here is useful or valuable to me?[/I], then the GM has to stick to the answer given. If the GM decides that Pup is in control, and then the player(s) (via their PCs) bring Pup around to their side, the GM isn't at liberty just to decide that now Pup's followers change their minds about their allegiance to Pup! This is just one illustration of how robust action declaration can be a mechanism for players exercising agency over the shared fiction. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
A Question Of Agency?
Top