Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Crimson Longinus" data-source="post: 8150433" data-attributes="member: 7025508">They had agency to take the risk. They had not agency to narrate their character directly succeeding. Which is more agency? Who knows at this point?  <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" alt="🤷‍♀️" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f937-2640.png" title="Woman shrugging    :woman_shrugging:" data-shortname=":woman_shrugging:" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" /> No.They're different but I don't think it can be said clearly which offers more agency from the player's perspective. It depends on the GM, it depends on the system it depends on the situation and it even depends on the player. For example in some situations I feel I have more agency with GM adjudication, as the GM can take account all different nuances of the situation, it will matter how I exactly I describe my character doing things and so forth, whereas with a roll my contribution is just a binary decision of whether to attempt the task or not.</blockquote>