Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Guest&nbsp; 85555" data-source="post: 8157156"><p>I would agree with this. As a player, that doesn't feel like a big burden to me. I think the issue is mainly one of if I am exploring, I typically want that sense of a n external world, and it is harder for me to achieve that if I am designing the world alongside the GM. That said, I do think this does work the otherway around. I am a pretty lazy GM at times, and one of the reasons I love high autonomy games is it allows the players to just run loose in a setting, reducing the amount of prep I need to do and reducing the stress of needing a clear 'adventure'. One of the things I find attractive about the games you guys are describing is it seems to take off some of that load from the GM, so I feel like they would be easier low prep sessions. That impression could be wrong of course, as I discovered Hillfolk had quite a bit of pre-game prep (but it was communal in nature and not the same as a solitary GM laboring away for a week before play)</p></blockquote><p></p>