Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
A Question Of Agency?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="hawkeyefan" data-source="post: 8159094" data-attributes="member: 6785785"><p>Sure, that kind of thing can happen. Absolutely. I think that's part of why we have these discussions, to get a variety of opinions on the topic. To analyze what may be going right or wrong in any example of play.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>To get a kind of foundation for understanding? Either for me or for them? </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Maybe that speaks to your own motives for bringing things up? I don't know....I can't help you with that.</p><p></p><p>I can explain that the reason I pointed out an example of firsthand experience being the most relevant kind of experience is because that's what we've been talking about. That's my stance. So I provided an example that supported that.</p><p></p><p>Do I think [USER=85555]@Bedrockgames[/USER] 's opinion of Hillfolk prior to playing it was invalid? No. Do I think it was less informed than someone who has played the game? Yes. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I wasn't arguing anything with the bit you quoted here. I was asking some questions. </p><p></p><p>So I think that your comment here about the "unwritten social rules" is pretty relevant. I think that D&D and many games like it leave a lot of that stuff up to the specific participants. They use a lot of vague language and constantly remind the reader that "this is all just suggestion, you should do whatever works". And this is something that has both pros and cons. </p><p></p><p>I do think that having principles of that kind clearly stated is a good idea. It's not a necessity, but it's a good idea. A lot of modern games do it, and it serves to make those unwritten social rules actually written. It gives the participants in the game common ground to discuss things. It gives them a foundation for having discussions about the game. </p><p></p><p>This is why most GMs of a game that has these.....Apocalypse World, Blades in the Dark.....are likely proceeding in a very similar manner in how they GM the game. Contrast that with D&D, where even within the same edition, you will get wildly varying accounts of how the game is played, and even in how it is "meant" to be played. </p><p></p><p>And for the most part, this is all a bit of a tangent, but as it relates to the agency of the player, I think knowing the rules of the game and how they're being applied and when is going to be a strong indicator that player agency is a consideration.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="hawkeyefan, post: 8159094, member: 6785785"] Sure, that kind of thing can happen. Absolutely. I think that's part of why we have these discussions, to get a variety of opinions on the topic. To analyze what may be going right or wrong in any example of play. To get a kind of foundation for understanding? Either for me or for them? Maybe that speaks to your own motives for bringing things up? I don't know....I can't help you with that. I can explain that the reason I pointed out an example of firsthand experience being the most relevant kind of experience is because that's what we've been talking about. That's my stance. So I provided an example that supported that. Do I think [USER=85555]@Bedrockgames[/USER] 's opinion of Hillfolk prior to playing it was invalid? No. Do I think it was less informed than someone who has played the game? Yes. I wasn't arguing anything with the bit you quoted here. I was asking some questions. So I think that your comment here about the "unwritten social rules" is pretty relevant. I think that D&D and many games like it leave a lot of that stuff up to the specific participants. They use a lot of vague language and constantly remind the reader that "this is all just suggestion, you should do whatever works". And this is something that has both pros and cons. I do think that having principles of that kind clearly stated is a good idea. It's not a necessity, but it's a good idea. A lot of modern games do it, and it serves to make those unwritten social rules actually written. It gives the participants in the game common ground to discuss things. It gives them a foundation for having discussions about the game. This is why most GMs of a game that has these.....Apocalypse World, Blades in the Dark.....are likely proceeding in a very similar manner in how they GM the game. Contrast that with D&D, where even within the same edition, you will get wildly varying accounts of how the game is played, and even in how it is "meant" to be played. And for the most part, this is all a bit of a tangent, but as it relates to the agency of the player, I think knowing the rules of the game and how they're being applied and when is going to be a strong indicator that player agency is a consideration. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
A Question Of Agency?
Top