Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="FrogReaver" data-source="post: 8161964" data-attributes="member: 6795602">I mean changing a forest to a desolate and empty forest where you can smell death and decay is altering the shared fiction as they conjure 2 different fictional images.  This kind of stuff is not uncommon in D&D campaigns where a DM accidently left out some important detail until the moment it's importance rears it's head.  Maybe that isn't altering established fiction to you because it's technically still a forest - but to me a forest and a desolate and empty forest where I can smell death and decay aren't the same things.Otherwise I get where you are coming from.If binding means it's in a state it will not be changed then I'd say that very much depends on the DM.  IMO.  Could and would are two different things.  If they can but would never do so I'd say it's established and has teeth and won't be changed.That said, I know very few DM's or DM advice given that would say never change something that the players are not yet aware of.  So I think you have a valid concern and point, but not all the way to the universal qualifier level.</blockquote>