Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
A Question Of Agency?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="hawkeyefan" data-source="post: 8162481" data-attributes="member: 6785785"><p>Then I think the only conclusion is that you prefer a GM directed style. If everything is already predetermined and cannot change, then I would propose that your players’ agency is much more limited than you realize. </p><p></p><p>This is not a bad thing, in and of itself. GM directed play can be fun and engaging. I also won’t miscategorize it as a railroad, because I don’t think they’re the same thing at all. The players are exploring the fictional world you’ve created. </p><p></p><p>What may be bad is that you seem to have some blindspots about your approach. Or at least, you seem to based on how you’ve described it here. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It is not. You have just described your game as consisting of fiction that’s largely determined ahead of time by the GM. You’ve even shot down the idea that a GM could make a change before committing to the fiction as some kind of aberrant method. The players then direct their characters to interact with the GM’s world as they see fit. They are playing to find out what the GM has already determined. For some reason, you see this as player agency, and when you describe it in words that you deem friendly enough, it’s good, but when others use words that are not as flattering, it’s an attack on the style. Even though you’re saying the same thing. </p><p></p><p>Further, I’d say your assertion that your predetermined approach creates a world that’s “more real” than the one others build through different kinds of play is exactly the kind of value judgment you’re complaining that others are making. </p><p></p><p>I’d also point out that your example is pretty flawed as it depicts illusionism, which says that you’re either attempting to paint the “other side” negatively or else you’ve failed to understand the style being proposed by them.</p><p></p><p>I play 5E and a good deal of that game revolves around ideas I have in my head/notes. It doesn’t make my 5E game less enjoyable than my Blades game. I enjoy both for a variety of reasons. But Blades allows for more player agency. The fiction is entirely about the characters the players have chosen to play such that if a different group of players and/or characters were to be involved, the fiction would be entirely different.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="hawkeyefan, post: 8162481, member: 6785785"] Then I think the only conclusion is that you prefer a GM directed style. If everything is already predetermined and cannot change, then I would propose that your players’ agency is much more limited than you realize. This is not a bad thing, in and of itself. GM directed play can be fun and engaging. I also won’t miscategorize it as a railroad, because I don’t think they’re the same thing at all. The players are exploring the fictional world you’ve created. What may be bad is that you seem to have some blindspots about your approach. Or at least, you seem to based on how you’ve described it here. It is not. You have just described your game as consisting of fiction that’s largely determined ahead of time by the GM. You’ve even shot down the idea that a GM could make a change before committing to the fiction as some kind of aberrant method. The players then direct their characters to interact with the GM’s world as they see fit. They are playing to find out what the GM has already determined. For some reason, you see this as player agency, and when you describe it in words that you deem friendly enough, it’s good, but when others use words that are not as flattering, it’s an attack on the style. Even though you’re saying the same thing. Further, I’d say your assertion that your predetermined approach creates a world that’s “more real” than the one others build through different kinds of play is exactly the kind of value judgment you’re complaining that others are making. I’d also point out that your example is pretty flawed as it depicts illusionism, which says that you’re either attempting to paint the “other side” negatively or else you’ve failed to understand the style being proposed by them. I play 5E and a good deal of that game revolves around ideas I have in my head/notes. It doesn’t make my 5E game less enjoyable than my Blades game. I enjoy both for a variety of reasons. But Blades allows for more player agency. The fiction is entirely about the characters the players have chosen to play such that if a different group of players and/or characters were to be involved, the fiction would be entirely different. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
A Question Of Agency?
Top