Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Manbearcat" data-source="post: 8163552" data-attributes="member: 6696971">No.  I'm getting it.For some reason you're wanting to stick with "Quest" here (as if I care about the term), then escalate things to "coming across as intentional obfuscation", and then die on this hill.I_do_not_care about the term.  That should be clear from my response.Get rid of Quest.  Nuke the whole damn site from orbit if you'd like so you're sure.I'm not invested in "Side Quest" as the parlance that so many use (I used it because so many others use it so I figured it was sufficiently informative and wasn't this hugely contentious language that apparently it is for you).  I'm not invested in it as technical jargon (which it clearly is not).  I'm CERTAINLY NOT invested in it for "intentional obfuscation."So, let this stand as me formally disavowing "Side Quest", sufficiently genuflecting, and bending the m-fing knee to whatever term you (or anyone else wants to use).Do_not_care.What I care about is that the sandbox contains "stuff to do" that is "energized by dramatic needs detached from the PCs."</blockquote>