Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
A Question of Character...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Grossout" data-source="post: 4072070" data-attributes="member: 45646"><p>I’m a little surprised at how many players seem to be very “character-focused” when it comes to playing D&D. I know it’s an ROLE PLAYING GAME - just hear me out.</p><p></p><p>First of all, assuming there are 8 core classes, and a couple/few “builds” of each, which if the Rogue preview is any indication, makes each build pretty different from each other, then you’re looking at a minimum of 16 different “types” of characters. (Keep in mind, this says nothing of some of the different skills/feats that are options for each, paragon paths and epic destinies eventually available, personal flavor we throw in ourselves, or soon to be released core classes.)</p><p></p><p>I gotta think we can all find some fun characters to play. I think the people who say ‘but I want to play a rogue who does A, B, and C – but can also do X, Y, and Z, because that’s the idea of the character I have in my head’ are being a little ridiculous. </p><p></p><p>They remind me of the Brian Regan joke on his “Live” CD about the guy at the donut shop. Brian wonders why they make such absurd donuts. Like there’s a guy who walks in the shop and says the following: </p><p></p><p>“Okay. I want a donut, and I want frosting all over it. And I want sprinkles. <em>But not all over it.</em> I just want them scrunched over on the edge. You got anything like that?” </p><p></p><p>As if a frosted donut covered in sprinkles, and a frosted donut without sprinkles just aren’t enough options! Who has that particular of a taste!</p><p></p><p>Anyway, back to those 16 types of characters. Here’s my thing: If you like the game of D&D, my guess is you will have fun playing ANY of those characters! Pick the one that infringes on your ideal the least and play the game! I mean, if someone told me I couldn’t play D&D unless I played a Warlord (the least enticing class according to me), I’d say “fine!”, and enthusiastically play the character. It’s a fun game (I hope) regardless!</p><p></p><p>I just think playing the game and ADVENTURING itself is what makes the game fun. I want to go to these places the DM has cooked up for me and kill the monsters he puts in my way. Traveling to new places, fighting new (and old) monsters, and telling a story through the party’s actions and dialogue – that’s what makes the game fun for me. People seem to get so caught up in what the characters’ abilities are. They are what they are. Choose what you can and move on with the game. </p><p></p><p>Just my two cents.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Grossout, post: 4072070, member: 45646"] I’m a little surprised at how many players seem to be very “character-focused” when it comes to playing D&D. I know it’s an ROLE PLAYING GAME - just hear me out. First of all, assuming there are 8 core classes, and a couple/few “builds” of each, which if the Rogue preview is any indication, makes each build pretty different from each other, then you’re looking at a minimum of 16 different “types” of characters. (Keep in mind, this says nothing of some of the different skills/feats that are options for each, paragon paths and epic destinies eventually available, personal flavor we throw in ourselves, or soon to be released core classes.) I gotta think we can all find some fun characters to play. I think the people who say ‘but I want to play a rogue who does A, B, and C – but can also do X, Y, and Z, because that’s the idea of the character I have in my head’ are being a little ridiculous. They remind me of the Brian Regan joke on his “Live” CD about the guy at the donut shop. Brian wonders why they make such absurd donuts. Like there’s a guy who walks in the shop and says the following: “Okay. I want a donut, and I want frosting all over it. And I want sprinkles. [I]But not all over it.[/I] I just want them scrunched over on the edge. You got anything like that?” As if a frosted donut covered in sprinkles, and a frosted donut without sprinkles just aren’t enough options! Who has that particular of a taste! Anyway, back to those 16 types of characters. Here’s my thing: If you like the game of D&D, my guess is you will have fun playing ANY of those characters! Pick the one that infringes on your ideal the least and play the game! I mean, if someone told me I couldn’t play D&D unless I played a Warlord (the least enticing class according to me), I’d say “fine!”, and enthusiastically play the character. It’s a fun game (I hope) regardless! I just think playing the game and ADVENTURING itself is what makes the game fun. I want to go to these places the DM has cooked up for me and kill the monsters he puts in my way. Traveling to new places, fighting new (and old) monsters, and telling a story through the party’s actions and dialogue – that’s what makes the game fun for me. People seem to get so caught up in what the characters’ abilities are. They are what they are. Choose what you can and move on with the game. Just my two cents. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
A Question of Character...
Top