Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
A Radical (Not to Mention Controversial) Change to Characteristic Determination
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="genshou" data-source="post: 2485985" data-attributes="member: 13164"><p>Not to mention that the horse gets size bonuses on many of those strength-based checks, most notably grappling.</p><p> </p><p>As explained above, yes a +4 for a human would be the same as a +4 for a horse, but because some effects of Strength also depend on size for other modifiers...</p><p> </p><p>Or, you could just refer to the first post in this thread (you know, the one that opened the topic and defined the general range of the discussion’s tangents?). It lists a different scale for the 15d6 method.</p><p> </p><p>That is true, but we should try to focus on the difference a 15d6 ability score calculation requires, as that was the original intent of this thread, and the intent behind all of my posts thus far. As stated above, refer to the first post in the thread to see what the real discussion going on here amounts to.</p><p> </p><p>Ah, but that’s the joy of the House Rules forum. Why leave untouched what you can tamper with? <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /></p><p></p><p>Seriously, though, your point is very valid. It’s just not a point that <strong>mythusmage</strong> seemed willing to consider when [he/she?] started this thread. That’s why the thread started. It’s about an alternate system that really functions rather well, except that rolling heroes requires a great deal of thought, and effects based on a score itself (such as carrying capacity, amount of time you can hold your breath, etc.) will have to be changed to somehow use the new scale.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="genshou, post: 2485985, member: 13164"] Not to mention that the horse gets size bonuses on many of those strength-based checks, most notably grappling. As explained above, yes a +4 for a human would be the same as a +4 for a horse, but because some effects of Strength also depend on size for other modifiers... Or, you could just refer to the first post in this thread (you know, the one that opened the topic and defined the general range of the discussion’s tangents?). It lists a different scale for the 15d6 method. That is true, but we should try to focus on the difference a 15d6 ability score calculation requires, as that was the original intent of this thread, and the intent behind all of my posts thus far. As stated above, refer to the first post in the thread to see what the real discussion going on here amounts to. Ah, but that’s the joy of the House Rules forum. Why leave untouched what you can tamper with? :D Seriously, though, your point is very valid. It’s just not a point that [B]mythusmage[/B] seemed willing to consider when [he/she?] started this thread. That’s why the thread started. It’s about an alternate system that really functions rather well, except that rolling heroes requires a great deal of thought, and effects based on a score itself (such as carrying capacity, amount of time you can hold your breath, etc.) will have to be changed to somehow use the new scale. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
A Radical (Not to Mention Controversial) Change to Characteristic Determination
Top