Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Henry" data-source="post: 4909449" data-attributes="member: 158"><p>Please don't tell me someone actually wasted time arguing about you not taking use rope. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin&nbsp; &nbsp; :D"&nbsp; data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /> Honestly, they have a lot more to be worried about than whether you can tie a sailor's knot or not -- like, for instance, him actually having a useful bonus versus his favored enemy. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> I swear, the Ranger's favored enemy thing from 2E felt nigh-on useless. I usually worked the giant-class thing from 1E back in whenever I DM'ed, because otherwise the ranger was a fighter who couldn't specialize and could only hide half as well as a thief...</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="Henry, post: 4909449, member: 158"] Please don't tell me someone actually wasted time arguing about you not taking use rope. :D Honestly, they have a lot more to be worried about than whether you can tie a sailor's knot or not -- like, for instance, him actually having a useful bonus versus his favored enemy. :) I swear, the Ranger's favored enemy thing from 2E felt nigh-on useless. I usually worked the giant-class thing from 1E back in whenever I DM'ed, because otherwise the ranger was a fighter who couldn't specialize and could only hide half as well as a thief... [/QUOTE]

Verification