Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Lanefan" data-source="post: 9816229" data-attributes="member: 29398">I'll look things up then and there if I have to, as will the player(s).Problem there is that the "mistake" has in fact happened in the fiction, and a player has an ironclad can't lose argument to have that same thing work the same way next time.As the campaign goes on and these things get hammered out, such in-session rules discussions tend IME to become a lot less common.  For me now, most of the rules debates are around things that haven't happened yet but that we can see coming e.g. rulings and clarifications for spells of level beyond what the PCs can currently cast, and those discussions tend to happen between sessions by email.Just like it's not the DM's place to tell me how to play my character, nor is it the place of another player to do so.  Not out-of-character, anyway.In-character, however, anything goes.  If your character has a beef with mine in the fiction then fine, let's throw down and settle it.  Roll initiative and bring it on. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />So a character stealing from random NPCs is fine but the same character stealing from other PCs is not?Yeah, no; not gonna fly.  Why not?  Because this runs directly afoul of my position that PCs and NPCs in the setting are - and should be treated as - the same.</blockquote>

Verification