Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Aus_Snow" data-source="post: 3309016" data-attributes="member: 29112">1. Yes, I would. Because I'll give virtually anything a go, once. Sure, it sounds about as much fun as most things. . . with only these tidbits of information to go on, mind you.2. More powerful. . . well, how about also having all PCs with races and/or templates with LA+2, say, or +3, +4. . . something like that? That might throw the usual power curve even further out of whack. . . which shouldn't matter.3. I would do things a little bit differently than this:. . . because, IME, that way lies chaos and much wailing and gnashing of teeths. YMMV, of course.I'd also have to think about that 'LA -> gestalt' thing. Nifft will probably provide a good explanation here; I too await this.'Weapons as Special Effects' looks like it would become problematic in all kinds of ways if used with a mass of WotC (and possibly 3rd party) classes, feats, spells, PrCs, items and so forth. Then again, I've only just given it a look over now, so perhaps not.I would probably give more Ability score improvements over the course of 20+ levels. At least one point per 2 character levels, I think.It also depends greatly on what you'd be doing wealth/magic item-wise .</blockquote>