Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
A reason why 4E is not as popular as it could have been
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Crazy Jerome" data-source="post: 5464752" data-attributes="member: 54877"><p>Another reason not yet mentioed why 4E is not as popular as it could have been: The designers gave up on some efforts as a lost cause. This managed to annoy all the people who didn't agree that the cause was lost, had another dog in the fight which this giving up undermined, or didn't understand the problem in the first place. And of course, when you give up a lost cause, you don't always have a clever solution that satisfies all the competing concerns, either. Major annoyance thus results.</p><p> </p><p>See, for example, "People think of wizards as Gandalf or Merlin. They are supposed to be better than everyone else. But Arthur and Aragon and Frodo and the young Galahad have to matter. So we'll make wizardry have a steep learning curve! Oops, tried that, some issues arose. We'll make Frodo critical to the story! Oops, tried that, some other issues arose. I know, we'll give Frodo and Aragon some equipment! Dang it, you guessed it! Aw hell, let's just chuck the whole problem. If someone wants Gandalf, they can give the wizard an extra 5 or 10 levels and be done with it."</p><p> </p><p>What was it Einstein said? That for every problem, there is a solution that is obvious, simple, and wrong. All of those prior efforts met that criteria. Finally, someone comes up with a solution that is rather simple, but not so obvious and certainly effective. But it takes guts to make it.</p><p> </p><p>Because you've just united in their cheezed off state everyone who liked wizards being overpowered at high levels, everyone who liked them being weak at low levels, who liked it being built into the rules that Frodo had to carve out a story niche to matter and that Aragon needed to be the king, and so forth and so on. These people don't even necessarily like or agree with each other, but they are all in agreement that your decision sucks. Note that there is nothing in the rules that says their group can't run the game to suit their preferences. But now they will have to ask for it, because there is nothing in the rules that validates their preferences, either. If they think that perhaps their group will not want to give them their desires, they are doubly cheesed.</p><p> </p><p>Making hard choices always makes you unpopular with some people.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Crazy Jerome, post: 5464752, member: 54877"] Another reason not yet mentioed why 4E is not as popular as it could have been: The designers gave up on some efforts as a lost cause. This managed to annoy all the people who didn't agree that the cause was lost, had another dog in the fight which this giving up undermined, or didn't understand the problem in the first place. And of course, when you give up a lost cause, you don't always have a clever solution that satisfies all the competing concerns, either. Major annoyance thus results. See, for example, "People think of wizards as Gandalf or Merlin. They are supposed to be better than everyone else. But Arthur and Aragon and Frodo and the young Galahad have to matter. So we'll make wizardry have a steep learning curve! Oops, tried that, some issues arose. We'll make Frodo critical to the story! Oops, tried that, some other issues arose. I know, we'll give Frodo and Aragon some equipment! Dang it, you guessed it! Aw hell, let's just chuck the whole problem. If someone wants Gandalf, they can give the wizard an extra 5 or 10 levels and be done with it." What was it Einstein said? That for every problem, there is a solution that is obvious, simple, and wrong. All of those prior efforts met that criteria. Finally, someone comes up with a solution that is rather simple, but not so obvious and certainly effective. But it takes guts to make it. Because you've just united in their cheezed off state everyone who liked wizards being overpowered at high levels, everyone who liked them being weak at low levels, who liked it being built into the rules that Frodo had to carve out a story niche to matter and that Aragon needed to be the king, and so forth and so on. These people don't even necessarily like or agree with each other, but they are all in agreement that your decision sucks. Note that there is nothing in the rules that says their group can't run the game to suit their preferences. But now they will have to ask for it, because there is nothing in the rules that validates their preferences, either. If they think that perhaps their group will not want to give them their desires, they are doubly cheesed. Making hard choices always makes you unpopular with some people. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
A reason why 4E is not as popular as it could have been
Top