Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
A Review of Dungeon Command by Wizards of the Coast
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MerricB" data-source="post: 7648730" data-attributes="member: 3586"><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><em>Dungeon Command</em> is a miniatures skirmish game by Wizards of the Coast for two to four players. It takes about 30-45 minutes to play the two-player game, which this review will address.</span></p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">A chief concept in <em>Dungeon Command</em> is that each player maintains their own warband; it is a customisable game. Players construct their warbands from creatures, order cards, map tiles and commander cards. The game is sold in set faction packs. At the time of writing, only the first two: <em>Sting of Lolth</em> and <em>Heart of Cormyr</em> are available. </span></p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">It is worth noting that miniature games, like trading card games, tend to require a moderate buy-in cost. It isn't the same paradigm as a boardgame where you get everything you need for all players in one box. You can play a starter scenario using just one faction box, but it won't really give you the full experience of the game. One faction box per player is really the minimum for interesting play.</span></p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">There are a number of design decisions in <em>Dungeon Command</em> that distinguish it from other miniature games I've played. I'm not a big player of miniature games, although I've played a lot of <em>BattleTech</em>, <em>D&D Miniatures</em>, <em>MageKnight</em> and <em>Heroclix</em> over the years. Let's have a look at them and how they add to the game. This review does not contain a detailed description of the rules and gameplay; you can find those in my </span><a href="http://www.enworld.org/en-world-official-reviews/326331-dungeon-command-first-game.html" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: 12px">first play report</span></a><span style="font-size: 12px">. This review looks at elements that I believe are notable about <em>Dungeon Command</em>.</span></p><p></p><p style="text-align: center"><span style="font-size: 12px"><img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=52402&stc=1&d=1343708851" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " data-size="" style="" /></span></p><p></p><p><strong><span style="font-size: 12px">Cards, not Dice</span></strong></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><em>Dungeon Command</em> doesn't use dice to determine success. Instead, all creatures do set damage with basic attacks. Order cards allow more effective attacks, special manoeuvres, or defensive parries. If you and your opponent have no cards in hand, you know exactly what the result of your attacks will be. However, if your opponent has a card in hand, then comes uncertainty. Is it a powerful attack? Will it allow a counter to my play?</span></p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">The game would work if you didn't use cards, in the same way that Chess works: a game about positioning and manoeuvre. The cards allow more variety of action than the basic 'Chess' game, as well as providing uncertainty as to results.</span></p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">Cards have requirements to play. Each creature has a level and a list of attributes, which the card has to match. A Level 2 STR creature can't play a Level 1 DEX card. The cards for each attribute emphasise different effects, and some cards relax requirements to allow play by creatures of a certain type: Spiders, for instance, can play "Web" despite them being DEX creatures rather than the INT required by the card.</span></p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">I didn't expect this design decision for this game, but it has proved an inspired one. I have become very frustrated over the years with a single dice roll determining a game, despite all the good play on a player's part. In this game, controlling the timing of the game (and thus players' access to cards) can be crucial. It should also be noted that each faction has one commander that helps you gain access to more order cards (or at least better quality cards).</span></p><p></p><p><strong><span style="font-size: 12px">The Growing Warband</span></strong></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">Each player has a leadership score that is based on the commander they've chosen (each set comes with two choices). This score increases at the end of each turn, and determines the maximum levels of creatures you can control on the battlefield at one time.</span></p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">This means that when a creature dies, the hole it creates can be filled with an equally powerful creature. Unlike <em>D&D Miniatures</em> and <em>Heroclix</em>, your entire force doesn't begin on the battlefield. Instead, you start with a small portion of your force and play new creatures as the game continues. There isn't a death spiral where once you start losing, you'll continue losing because you have fewer creatures than your opponent: instead, you'll have equivalent forces for the entire battle, keeping the game interesting until the end. If there's one design decision that I think really makes this game special, this is it.</span></p><p></p><p><strong><span style="font-size: 12px">Morale, Treasure and Cowering</span></strong></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">If you always have creatures on the battlefield, with new ones being played to replace those lost, how do you win the game? A second rating, that of Morale, covers that. Morale is lost when a creature is killed, an amount equal to that creature's level. Once your Morale reaches zero, then you lose the game. (It is also possible that one player has no creatures left on the battlefield, in which case whoever has the higher Morale wins).</span></p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">That's easy enough; however, the addition of Treasure and Cowering make the game tactically richer. Six treasure piles are placed around the board at the beginning of the game. By picking them up, you can increase your morale. You can also save a creature from dying by cowering - you lose morale to prevent the damage. </span></p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">These rules work really well. I've seen fast movement creatures - though weak in combat - gather enough treasure to take victory because the slow-moving force against them couldn't kill enough to make up the difference. I've also seen players take 3 morale hits to protect a Level 2 creature because the positioning of that creature was important and losing it would hurt more than the morale hit.</span></p><p></p><p><strong><span style="font-size: 12px">A Game and Two Expansions</span></strong></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">Apart from the primary <em>Dungeon Command</em> game, a set also comes with 12 cards for using the miniatures in the <em>D&D Adventure System</em> games - <em>Castle Ravenloft</em>, <em>Wrath of Ashardalon</em> and <em>Legend of Drizzt</em>. The <em>Sting of Lolth</em> set provides more monsters for your foes to face, but the <em>Heart of Cormyr</em> set introduces a new mechanic: the Ally, which adds a new encounter card to the mix that allows one of the miniatures to join your forces as a non-player 'Hero'.</span></p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">And, of course, the miniatures are also of the proper scale to add them to a <em>Dungeons & Dragons</em> role-playing game (or the Fantasy RPG of your choice). <em>Heart of Cormyr</em> gives you a selection of heroic miniatures, while <em>Sting of Lolth</em> is a drow-themed set that is particularly useful at present, it being the "Year of the Underdark" for D&D products from Wizards of the Coast.</span></p><p></p><p style="text-align: center"><span style="font-size: 12px"><img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=52403&stc=1&d=1343708851" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " data-size="" style="" /></span></p><p></p><p><strong><span style="font-size: 12px">Customisation of Forces</span></strong></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">A starting box comes with 12 miniatures and 36 order cards, along with 2 commanders and 4 tiles. Each player requires 12 miniatures, 30 order cards, 1 commander and 4 tiles, so there is a small amount of customisation available immediately. It just isn't that interesting.</span></p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">One you add a second box to your collection, you have a lot more meaningful options. You are restricted to having four copies of any card or miniature in your warband, and you get one or two copies of each in a faction box. Getting four of everything is likely to be frustrating, as you'll have a lot of duplicate components you don't need.</span></p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">The secondary market will likely help there, especially due to the separate markets the components have: the order cards are only useful to Dungeon Command players, as people wanting the miniatures for D&D or the Adventure System boardgames won't need them.</span></p><p></p><p><strong><span style="font-size: 12px">Component Quality</span></strong></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">All of the components in Dungeon Command are quite attractive to look at, although I've seen better prepainted miniatures than those in these sets. I very much appreciate how durable the miniatures are; they are attractive enough for my purposes, although good miniature painters could do a much better job.</span></p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">The dungeon tiles have artwork by Jason Engle, who has been designing tiles for the D&D game for many years now. I love the design of his tiles and these ones look very good. I, and others, have noticed slight warping of the tiles in moist conditions, just enough to prove troublesome. This is disappointing, to say the least. The tiles are double-sided, with wilderness on one side and a dungeon on the other. I particularly like the set-up tiles, which depict entrances/exits from the caves and castles for the various factions. There are several terrain types on the tiles, which make for variety in the battles.</span></p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">The cards - unlike those in the Adventure System games - are full colour and all have original art on them. They really look very nice, and I appreciate that the creature cards have pictures of the miniatures for identification purposes. The card stock feels thinner and less durable than those of <em>Magic</em> cards, and I wasted no time in sleeving my set; I'd advise you do the same.</span></p><p></p><p><strong><span style="font-size: 12px">Cliffs of Doom</span></strong></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">Although I like most of the design decisions in <em>Dungeon Command</em>, there is one game element that irritates me: the Cliffs of Doom. When you play on the outdoor maps, the walls of the dungeon become high cliffs and mesas, thus impassable terrain. This is fine for most ground-bound creatures, but for some reason they can't be flown over either!</span></p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">I can appreciate why it is this way for game-play reasons, but I really wish the designers had found another solution to this problem.</span></p><p></p><p><strong><span style="font-size: 12px">The Right Amount of Luck?</span></strong></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">Although <em>Dungeon Command</em> does not have chance-based resolution of effects, the game does still possess uncertainty, primarily in the order of creature cards and order cards drawn to hand; you can't play a creature if you haven't drawn it, likewise with the order cards. Not everyone is going to appreciate this method, which is also used in such games as <em>Magic</em> and <em>Summoner Wars</em>.</span></p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">I enjoy managing chaos (rather than being managed by chaos, which is how I feel about luck-based resolution at times), and the amount of unpredictability in your draws can be ameliorated by the customisation of the game and the way you can replace dead creatures. However, there will be times where your draw just works against you. It is something to be aware of before you play this game.</span></p><p></p><p><strong><span style="font-size: 12px">Conclusion</span></strong></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">I did not expect much of <em>Dungeon Command</em>. Its predecessor, <em>D&D Miniatures</em> had been an entertaining game, but it could be quite random and never quite grasped my devotion (although I loved all the miniatures it provided for my RPG sessions). However, as I played more and more of <em>Dungeon Command</em> in preparation for this review, I realised how good the design actually was. "Good" then became "Great": I really enjoy this game!</span></p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">The game solves problems I've had with miniature skirmish games before, and does it with solutions that are elegant and effective. The way you can reinforce your warband, the cowering rules, and the card-based gameplay make for a game that I really enjoy. <em>Dungeon Command</em> is an exceptional game, and I am eagerly awaiting the release of new sets so I can see more of what is possible in the game.</span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MerricB, post: 7648730, member: 3586"] [SIZE=3][I]Dungeon Command[/I] is a miniatures skirmish game by Wizards of the Coast for two to four players. It takes about 30-45 minutes to play the two-player game, which this review will address.[/SIZE] [SIZE=3]A chief concept in [I]Dungeon Command[/I] is that each player maintains their own warband; it is a customisable game. Players construct their warbands from creatures, order cards, map tiles and commander cards. The game is sold in set faction packs. At the time of writing, only the first two: [I]Sting of Lolth[/I] and [I]Heart of Cormyr[/I] are available. [/SIZE] [SIZE=3]It is worth noting that miniature games, like trading card games, tend to require a moderate buy-in cost. It isn't the same paradigm as a boardgame where you get everything you need for all players in one box. You can play a starter scenario using just one faction box, but it won't really give you the full experience of the game. One faction box per player is really the minimum for interesting play.[/SIZE] [SIZE=3]There are a number of design decisions in [I]Dungeon Command[/I] that distinguish it from other miniature games I've played. I'm not a big player of miniature games, although I've played a lot of [I]BattleTech[/I], [I]D&D Miniatures[/I], [I]MageKnight[/I] and [I]Heroclix[/I] over the years. Let's have a look at them and how they add to the game. This review does not contain a detailed description of the rules and gameplay; you can find those in my [/SIZE][URL="http://www.enworld.org/en-world-official-reviews/326331-dungeon-command-first-game.html"][SIZE=3]first play report[/SIZE][/URL][SIZE=3]. This review looks at elements that I believe are notable about [I]Dungeon Command[/I].[/SIZE] [CENTER][SIZE=3][IMG]http://www.enworld.org/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=52402&stc=1&d=1343708851[/IMG][/SIZE][/CENTER] [B][SIZE=3]Cards, not Dice[/SIZE][/B] [SIZE=3][I]Dungeon Command[/I] doesn't use dice to determine success. Instead, all creatures do set damage with basic attacks. Order cards allow more effective attacks, special manoeuvres, or defensive parries. If you and your opponent have no cards in hand, you know exactly what the result of your attacks will be. However, if your opponent has a card in hand, then comes uncertainty. Is it a powerful attack? Will it allow a counter to my play?[/SIZE] [SIZE=3]The game would work if you didn't use cards, in the same way that Chess works: a game about positioning and manoeuvre. The cards allow more variety of action than the basic 'Chess' game, as well as providing uncertainty as to results.[/SIZE] [SIZE=3]Cards have requirements to play. Each creature has a level and a list of attributes, which the card has to match. A Level 2 STR creature can't play a Level 1 DEX card. The cards for each attribute emphasise different effects, and some cards relax requirements to allow play by creatures of a certain type: Spiders, for instance, can play "Web" despite them being DEX creatures rather than the INT required by the card.[/SIZE] [SIZE=3]I didn't expect this design decision for this game, but it has proved an inspired one. I have become very frustrated over the years with a single dice roll determining a game, despite all the good play on a player's part. In this game, controlling the timing of the game (and thus players' access to cards) can be crucial. It should also be noted that each faction has one commander that helps you gain access to more order cards (or at least better quality cards).[/SIZE] [B][SIZE=3]The Growing Warband[/SIZE][/B] [SIZE=3]Each player has a leadership score that is based on the commander they've chosen (each set comes with two choices). This score increases at the end of each turn, and determines the maximum levels of creatures you can control on the battlefield at one time.[/SIZE] [SIZE=3]This means that when a creature dies, the hole it creates can be filled with an equally powerful creature. Unlike [I]D&D Miniatures[/I] and [I]Heroclix[/I], your entire force doesn't begin on the battlefield. Instead, you start with a small portion of your force and play new creatures as the game continues. There isn't a death spiral where once you start losing, you'll continue losing because you have fewer creatures than your opponent: instead, you'll have equivalent forces for the entire battle, keeping the game interesting until the end. If there's one design decision that I think really makes this game special, this is it.[/SIZE] [B][SIZE=3]Morale, Treasure and Cowering[/SIZE][/B] [SIZE=3]If you always have creatures on the battlefield, with new ones being played to replace those lost, how do you win the game? A second rating, that of Morale, covers that. Morale is lost when a creature is killed, an amount equal to that creature's level. Once your Morale reaches zero, then you lose the game. (It is also possible that one player has no creatures left on the battlefield, in which case whoever has the higher Morale wins).[/SIZE] [SIZE=3]That's easy enough; however, the addition of Treasure and Cowering make the game tactically richer. Six treasure piles are placed around the board at the beginning of the game. By picking them up, you can increase your morale. You can also save a creature from dying by cowering - you lose morale to prevent the damage. [/SIZE] [SIZE=3]These rules work really well. I've seen fast movement creatures - though weak in combat - gather enough treasure to take victory because the slow-moving force against them couldn't kill enough to make up the difference. I've also seen players take 3 morale hits to protect a Level 2 creature because the positioning of that creature was important and losing it would hurt more than the morale hit.[/SIZE] [B][SIZE=3]A Game and Two Expansions[/SIZE][/B] [SIZE=3]Apart from the primary [I]Dungeon Command[/I] game, a set also comes with 12 cards for using the miniatures in the [I]D&D Adventure System[/I] games - [I]Castle Ravenloft[/I], [I]Wrath of Ashardalon[/I] and [I]Legend of Drizzt[/I]. The [I]Sting of Lolth[/I] set provides more monsters for your foes to face, but the [I]Heart of Cormyr[/I] set introduces a new mechanic: the Ally, which adds a new encounter card to the mix that allows one of the miniatures to join your forces as a non-player 'Hero'.[/SIZE] [SIZE=3]And, of course, the miniatures are also of the proper scale to add them to a [I]Dungeons & Dragons[/I] role-playing game (or the Fantasy RPG of your choice). [I]Heart of Cormyr[/I] gives you a selection of heroic miniatures, while [I]Sting of Lolth[/I] is a drow-themed set that is particularly useful at present, it being the "Year of the Underdark" for D&D products from Wizards of the Coast.[/SIZE] [CENTER][SIZE=3][IMG]http://www.enworld.org/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=52403&stc=1&d=1343708851[/IMG][/SIZE][/CENTER] [B][SIZE=3]Customisation of Forces[/SIZE][/B] [SIZE=3]A starting box comes with 12 miniatures and 36 order cards, along with 2 commanders and 4 tiles. Each player requires 12 miniatures, 30 order cards, 1 commander and 4 tiles, so there is a small amount of customisation available immediately. It just isn't that interesting.[/SIZE] [SIZE=3]One you add a second box to your collection, you have a lot more meaningful options. You are restricted to having four copies of any card or miniature in your warband, and you get one or two copies of each in a faction box. Getting four of everything is likely to be frustrating, as you'll have a lot of duplicate components you don't need.[/SIZE] [SIZE=3]The secondary market will likely help there, especially due to the separate markets the components have: the order cards are only useful to Dungeon Command players, as people wanting the miniatures for D&D or the Adventure System boardgames won't need them.[/SIZE] [B][SIZE=3]Component Quality[/SIZE][/B] [SIZE=3]All of the components in Dungeon Command are quite attractive to look at, although I've seen better prepainted miniatures than those in these sets. I very much appreciate how durable the miniatures are; they are attractive enough for my purposes, although good miniature painters could do a much better job.[/SIZE] [SIZE=3]The dungeon tiles have artwork by Jason Engle, who has been designing tiles for the D&D game for many years now. I love the design of his tiles and these ones look very good. I, and others, have noticed slight warping of the tiles in moist conditions, just enough to prove troublesome. This is disappointing, to say the least. The tiles are double-sided, with wilderness on one side and a dungeon on the other. I particularly like the set-up tiles, which depict entrances/exits from the caves and castles for the various factions. There are several terrain types on the tiles, which make for variety in the battles.[/SIZE] [SIZE=3]The cards - unlike those in the Adventure System games - are full colour and all have original art on them. They really look very nice, and I appreciate that the creature cards have pictures of the miniatures for identification purposes. The card stock feels thinner and less durable than those of [I]Magic[/I] cards, and I wasted no time in sleeving my set; I'd advise you do the same.[/SIZE] [B][SIZE=3]Cliffs of Doom[/SIZE][/B] [SIZE=3]Although I like most of the design decisions in [I]Dungeon Command[/I], there is one game element that irritates me: the Cliffs of Doom. When you play on the outdoor maps, the walls of the dungeon become high cliffs and mesas, thus impassable terrain. This is fine for most ground-bound creatures, but for some reason they can't be flown over either![/SIZE] [SIZE=3]I can appreciate why it is this way for game-play reasons, but I really wish the designers had found another solution to this problem.[/SIZE] [B][SIZE=3]The Right Amount of Luck?[/SIZE][/B] [SIZE=3]Although [I]Dungeon Command[/I] does not have chance-based resolution of effects, the game does still possess uncertainty, primarily in the order of creature cards and order cards drawn to hand; you can't play a creature if you haven't drawn it, likewise with the order cards. Not everyone is going to appreciate this method, which is also used in such games as [I]Magic[/I] and [I]Summoner Wars[/I].[/SIZE] [SIZE=3]I enjoy managing chaos (rather than being managed by chaos, which is how I feel about luck-based resolution at times), and the amount of unpredictability in your draws can be ameliorated by the customisation of the game and the way you can replace dead creatures. However, there will be times where your draw just works against you. It is something to be aware of before you play this game.[/SIZE] [B][SIZE=3]Conclusion[/SIZE][/B] [SIZE=3]I did not expect much of [I]Dungeon Command[/I]. Its predecessor, [I]D&D Miniatures[/I] had been an entertaining game, but it could be quite random and never quite grasped my devotion (although I loved all the miniatures it provided for my RPG sessions). However, as I played more and more of [I]Dungeon Command[/I] in preparation for this review, I realised how good the design actually was. "Good" then became "Great": I really enjoy this game![/SIZE] [SIZE=3]The game solves problems I've had with miniature skirmish games before, and does it with solutions that are elegant and effective. The way you can reinforce your warband, the cowering rules, and the card-based gameplay make for a game that I really enjoy. [I]Dungeon Command[/I] is an exceptional game, and I am eagerly awaiting the release of new sets so I can see more of what is possible in the game.[/SIZE] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
A Review of Dungeon Command by Wizards of the Coast
Top