Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
Playing the Game
Play by Post
Living Worlds
Living 4th Edition
A Simple Errand (DM:renau1g, Judge: covaithe)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kalidrev" data-source="post: 5087173" data-attributes="member: 84005"><p>[sblock=Treasure Distribution] Since Reklaw is ditching Rrek and bringing in a new character, I think we need to look at how much treasure we have collected, and determine who is getting what.</p><p></p><p>Treasure Totals:</p><p></p><p>Amulet of Physical Resolve +1: 520 gp</p><p>Goblin Totem Dagger +1: 520 gp</p><p>Acidic Fullblade +1: 840 gp</p><p>Repulsion Leather Armor +1: 520 gp</p><p>2 gems worth 189 gp each (378 gp for both) (time gold)</p><p>3 gems worth 267 gp each (801 gp for all 3) (time gold)</p><p>Gems (# not given) worth 200 gp</p><p>Coins worth 800 gp</p><p></p><p>The total above includes time gold, which should be in the following amounts:</p><p></p><p>Crag/Ingot/Dorn: 3 months x 89gp = 267gp</p><p>Jax/Rrek: 3 months x 63gp = 189gp</p><p></p><p>Huh, will you look at that. We have gems that match those perfectly. How convenient <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p>Here is what I propose for treasure distribution:</p><p></p><p>For now, ignore the 189gp and 267gp gems, since each of us will be getting one for time gold.</p><p></p><p>IF Reklaw is <span style="color: Red">retiring</span> <span style="color: DeepSkyBlue">Rrek</span> to bring in <span style="color: Lime">Finch</span>:</p><p></p><p>Jax: Amulet (520gp) + Dagger (520gp) = 1040gp</p><p>Ingot: Full Blade (840gp) = 840gp</p><p>Dorn: Armor (520gp) + the assorted gems (200gp) + 40gp in coins = 760gp</p><p>Crag: 760gp in coins = 760gp</p><p>Rrek: 0gp or items.</p><p></p><p>This may seem entirely unfair, however, because Reklaw is getting rid of Rrek, he will lose any treasure that is given to him anyway, and even though Finch is being brought in, he was not part of the adventure, and thus did not earn a share of the loot.</p><p></p><p>IF Reklaw has created <span style="color: Lime">Finch</span> as his 2nd character and is <span style="color: Red">NOT replacing</span> <span style="color: DeepSkyBlue">Rrek</span> (or if the DM/Judges feel Rrek should get a share of the loot anyway):</p><p></p><p>Jax: Amulet (520gp) + Dagger (520) = 1040gp</p><p>Ingot: Full Blade (840gp) = 840gp</p><p>Dorn: Armor (520gp)</p><p>Rrek: Assorted gems (200gp) + 300 gp in coins = 500gp</p><p>Crag: 500 gp in coins = 500gp</p><p></p><p>Unfortunately, this distribution skews things way in the favor of those who have actually been given items, but I'm sure R1 would make up for it in the next leg of the adventure. [/sblock]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kalidrev, post: 5087173, member: 84005"] [sblock=Treasure Distribution] Since Reklaw is ditching Rrek and bringing in a new character, I think we need to look at how much treasure we have collected, and determine who is getting what. Treasure Totals: Amulet of Physical Resolve +1: 520 gp Goblin Totem Dagger +1: 520 gp Acidic Fullblade +1: 840 gp Repulsion Leather Armor +1: 520 gp 2 gems worth 189 gp each (378 gp for both) (time gold) 3 gems worth 267 gp each (801 gp for all 3) (time gold) Gems (# not given) worth 200 gp Coins worth 800 gp The total above includes time gold, which should be in the following amounts: Crag/Ingot/Dorn: 3 months x 89gp = 267gp Jax/Rrek: 3 months x 63gp = 189gp Huh, will you look at that. We have gems that match those perfectly. How convenient ;) Here is what I propose for treasure distribution: For now, ignore the 189gp and 267gp gems, since each of us will be getting one for time gold. IF Reklaw is [COLOR=Red]retiring[/COLOR] [COLOR=DeepSkyBlue]Rrek[/COLOR] to bring in [COLOR=Lime]Finch[/COLOR]: Jax: Amulet (520gp) + Dagger (520gp) = 1040gp Ingot: Full Blade (840gp) = 840gp Dorn: Armor (520gp) + the assorted gems (200gp) + 40gp in coins = 760gp Crag: 760gp in coins = 760gp Rrek: 0gp or items. This may seem entirely unfair, however, because Reklaw is getting rid of Rrek, he will lose any treasure that is given to him anyway, and even though Finch is being brought in, he was not part of the adventure, and thus did not earn a share of the loot. IF Reklaw has created [COLOR=Lime]Finch[/COLOR] as his 2nd character and is [COLOR=Red]NOT replacing[/COLOR] [COLOR=DeepSkyBlue]Rrek[/COLOR] (or if the DM/Judges feel Rrek should get a share of the loot anyway): Jax: Amulet (520gp) + Dagger (520) = 1040gp Ingot: Full Blade (840gp) = 840gp Dorn: Armor (520gp) Rrek: Assorted gems (200gp) + 300 gp in coins = 500gp Crag: 500 gp in coins = 500gp Unfortunately, this distribution skews things way in the favor of those who have actually been given items, but I'm sure R1 would make up for it in the next leg of the adventure. [/sblock] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Playing the Game
Play by Post
Living Worlds
Living 4th Edition
A Simple Errand (DM:renau1g, Judge: covaithe)
Top
