Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
A simple, system-neutral encumbrance system incorporating weight and bulk
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Imaculata" data-source="post: 7319010" data-attributes="member: 6801286"><p>This forum is a market place of ideas. If you bring up a topic, people will discuss all sorts of aspects of that topic. It's not just "Yay" or "Nay". People will offer ideas for improvements, or share homebrew rules for emcumbrance that they've used, or recall stories of why they started or stopped using such a system. All of that is on topic, and may inspire you to make changes to your system.</p><p></p><p>Heck, in a recent topic about the Wish spell, I brought up how I've ruled the use of a Genie that grants wishes, and how I added limitations to prevent catastrophic events. The Genie is a sidetrack for sure, but totally on topic. </p><p></p><p>I don't think I've ever minded people bringing up their own systems whenever I opened a thread on a certain homebrew rule. In fact, it is what I welcome. And I think most people on this forum would agree with that. They want to share their ideas with other people. It is an idea exchange. A discussion, if you will.</p><p></p><p>Now, I criticized your system for being <u>convoluted</u>. I think that's fair. I think it is the primary reason why many people ignore encumbrance rules. I then suggested an alternative way to rule emcumbrance. Not a rule that I've used myself, but I would use it if I were to start caring about encumbrance in my games. Most people would welcome such an idea, because this is a discussion forum. That is the whole point of the forum. It is food for thought.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Imaculata, post: 7319010, member: 6801286"] This forum is a market place of ideas. If you bring up a topic, people will discuss all sorts of aspects of that topic. It's not just "Yay" or "Nay". People will offer ideas for improvements, or share homebrew rules for emcumbrance that they've used, or recall stories of why they started or stopped using such a system. All of that is on topic, and may inspire you to make changes to your system. Heck, in a recent topic about the Wish spell, I brought up how I've ruled the use of a Genie that grants wishes, and how I added limitations to prevent catastrophic events. The Genie is a sidetrack for sure, but totally on topic. I don't think I've ever minded people bringing up their own systems whenever I opened a thread on a certain homebrew rule. In fact, it is what I welcome. And I think most people on this forum would agree with that. They want to share their ideas with other people. It is an idea exchange. A discussion, if you will. Now, I criticized your system for being [U]convoluted[/U]. I think that's fair. I think it is the primary reason why many people ignore encumbrance rules. I then suggested an alternative way to rule emcumbrance. Not a rule that I've used myself, but I would use it if I were to start caring about encumbrance in my games. Most people would welcome such an idea, because this is a discussion forum. That is the whole point of the forum. It is food for thought. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
A simple, system-neutral encumbrance system incorporating weight and bulk
Top