Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Li Shenron" data-source="post: 1794441" data-attributes="member: 1465">I was thinking about what LV previously wrote about using 1st edition combat. 3rd edition combat is based on the standard+move turn, which is nice in its own way, but also could have some not-so-nice side effects: first and foremost, if characters get more actions in their turn, combat goes definitely less smooth compared to how it would be if they got only 1 action.Therefore I'd like to ask if this idea you're working on will be simply that on your turn you get 2 actions just as in the core rules (except that it is different than standard+move), or if you meant to give those 2 actions at different initiative points, so that you do your first action, then someone else can act, then again later in the same round you get the second action.In a way this would be like having turns of 1 action only, but it could be more complicated if your 1st action would determine how soon you are going to get the second action.I think this kind of idea would deserve a thread on its own, because it is actually quite complicated! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>