Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Kobold Boots" data-source="post: 5779984" data-attributes="member: 92239">That has nothing to do with what I'm talking about.If the OGL was properly written and Pathfinder occurred then WoTC would be seeing royalties or Pathfinder wouldn't exist to compete with D&amp;D.&nbsp; Statistically there's always going to be a group that doesn't change with an edition update, a group that does and a group that falls away.&nbsp; Since WoTC is making no direct profit off of Pathfinder as it exists now, any profit at all from a new edition out of the existing group of people that are only playing Pathfinder is better than none that presently exists.Dormancy and the other editions is something that can be cleanly taken away from my argument as dormant players wouldn't be buying Pathfinder or 4th ed.&nbsp; Same with the 1st and 2nd edition-ers.Of course the problem set is more complicated than any of this as there's obviously a group that buys both 4th and Pathfinder.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Kobold Boots, post: 5779984, member: 92239"] That has nothing to do with what I'm talking about. If the OGL was properly written and Pathfinder occurred then WoTC would be seeing royalties or Pathfinder wouldn't exist to compete with D&D. Statistically there's always going to be a group that doesn't change with an edition update, a group that does and a group that falls away. Since WoTC is making no direct profit off of Pathfinder as it exists now, any profit at all from a new edition out of the existing group of people that are only playing Pathfinder is better than none that presently exists. Dormancy and the other editions is something that can be cleanly taken away from my argument as dormant players wouldn't be buying Pathfinder or 4th ed. Same with the 1st and 2nd edition-ers. Of course the problem set is more complicated than any of this as there's obviously a group that buys both 4th and Pathfinder. [/QUOTE]

Verification