Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
A solution to the "core books sell" problem?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="the Jester" data-source="post: 6228815" data-attributes="member: 1210"><p>I'm not sure why you think you're an authority on what "TRUE D&D!!" is, but <em>you're not.</em> While it's fine for you to love or hate whatever editions you choose, adding a "Oh, but <em>you guys</em> don't play <strong>REAL</strong> D&D because you aren't playing old-skoool enough" is neither accurate nor constructive- it's edition warring at its finest, and frankly, it's insulting to everyone who loves the game in its post-TSR iterations. </p><p></p><p>The game says "Dungeons and Dragons" on the cover. The company that owns the brand put it out. Therefore, it is indeed D&D. It may not be D&D <em>to your taste,</em> but claiming that your tastes dictate whether something is "true D&D" or not is just ridiculous. It's as ridiculous as claiming that Sandman isn't a comic because it doesn't have superheroes and it's not an old EC Horror book. It's like saying that the new Star Trek movies aren't Star Trek because Shatner. </p><p></p><p>The fact is, neither I nor you get to decide what Dungeons and Dragons, comic books or Star Trek are. The guys who own the game decide what D&D is; all we get to decide is whether we're playing, whether we like it and whether to move on with the new edition when it comes out. That's it. Claiming that your taste dictates whether a game is or is not D&D is ignoring the fact that people have different tastes and playstyles and have since the very first days of D&D. It's also taking it for granted that you are not just right for your own tastes, but somehow have some magical objective sense of what D&D is to all other people. Clearly, <em>you don't</em>- because you are discarding two of D&D's editions, each of which has a lot of fans (not to mention a lot to offer the game as a whole!), and all those fans would disagree with you.</p><p></p><p>So, in short, while it's fine to hate on later editions, please don't act like your way is the One True Way To D&D. It isn't, and acting like it is insults everyone who plays 3e or 4e D&D. "Your game isn't D&D, it's just another RPG" doesn't fly either. It's the sort of contemptuous backhanded attack that says, "Oh, do it your way, <em>but you're doing it wrong.</em>" </p><p></p><p>No. If someone is playing the game (in ANY version) and having fun, you don't get to paint "NOT D&D" on their game.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="the Jester, post: 6228815, member: 1210"] I'm not sure why you think you're an authority on what "TRUE D&D!!" is, but [i]you're not.[/i] While it's fine for you to love or hate whatever editions you choose, adding a "Oh, but [i]you guys[/i] don't play [b]REAL[/b] D&D because you aren't playing old-skoool enough" is neither accurate nor constructive- it's edition warring at its finest, and frankly, it's insulting to everyone who loves the game in its post-TSR iterations. The game says "Dungeons and Dragons" on the cover. The company that owns the brand put it out. Therefore, it is indeed D&D. It may not be D&D [i]to your taste,[/i] but claiming that your tastes dictate whether something is "true D&D" or not is just ridiculous. It's as ridiculous as claiming that Sandman isn't a comic because it doesn't have superheroes and it's not an old EC Horror book. It's like saying that the new Star Trek movies aren't Star Trek because Shatner. The fact is, neither I nor you get to decide what Dungeons and Dragons, comic books or Star Trek are. The guys who own the game decide what D&D is; all we get to decide is whether we're playing, whether we like it and whether to move on with the new edition when it comes out. That's it. Claiming that your taste dictates whether a game is or is not D&D is ignoring the fact that people have different tastes and playstyles and have since the very first days of D&D. It's also taking it for granted that you are not just right for your own tastes, but somehow have some magical objective sense of what D&D is to all other people. Clearly, [i]you don't[/i]- because you are discarding two of D&D's editions, each of which has a lot of fans (not to mention a lot to offer the game as a whole!), and all those fans would disagree with you. So, in short, while it's fine to hate on later editions, please don't act like your way is the One True Way To D&D. It isn't, and acting like it is insults everyone who plays 3e or 4e D&D. "Your game isn't D&D, it's just another RPG" doesn't fly either. It's the sort of contemptuous backhanded attack that says, "Oh, do it your way, [i]but you're doing it wrong.[/i]" No. If someone is playing the game (in ANY version) and having fun, you don't get to paint "NOT D&D" on their game. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
A solution to the "core books sell" problem?
Top