Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
A subtle reminder from wizards.(or not so subtle)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Aegeri" data-source="post: 5264131" data-attributes="member: 78116"><p>Why would you want to use the absolutely terrible, fundamentally and mechanically flawed solos of the original MM? This isn't a choice between an essentials done Red Dragon and one from the original MM. This is a choice between something with 2 years of updates to monsters and one that is <em>fundamentally broken</em>.</p><p> </p><p>Noting that most heroic monsters from the original MM are in fact still okay. There are some stupid things (Bloodfire Harpies and Needlefang Drakes) but in general they are functional. New Kobolds are new options, because many MM heroic tier monsters are still perfectly viable (Dragonshield Kobolds for example).</p><p> </p><p>Now when we get into the paragon and <em>especially</em> epic monsters - many of whom are so useless not even upgrading their damage helps - we have a problem. Most MM elites and solos are worthless after heroic tier. Orcus is arguably the biggest joke in all of 4E for an epic level end of game threat. Most regular MM high paragon and epic monsters are nowhere near competitive with an epic party (damage and power wise). Compare high level monsters from MM3 like Forsaken or Tulgar with just about anything high level (level 21+) in the original MM. Heck compare similar epic tier monsters in MM2 to MM1. MM2 creatures have better power design, so frequently all you have to do is change damage maths and bam, you're done. </p><p> </p><p>I mean, what Wizards are saying about the PHB and DMG is 100% true. What they are saying about the MM just rings absolutely hollow to me. It's a fundamentally broken book, with many creatures being useless (minions, many solos, some elites) and others being so far behind the curve they aren't worthwhile using. Of course it's worth noting I feel this is <em>only</em> for most creatures in paragon and beyond. That's where the gaping flaws show up and those are the creatures that perform the worst.</p><p> </p><p>Since the MM3 has come out I've used monsters almost exclusively from it and the MM2 (with adjusted maths). I rarely use creatures from the original MM after heroic tier at all and I never touch the solos in the book.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Aegeri, post: 5264131, member: 78116"] Why would you want to use the absolutely terrible, fundamentally and mechanically flawed solos of the original MM? This isn't a choice between an essentials done Red Dragon and one from the original MM. This is a choice between something with 2 years of updates to monsters and one that is [i]fundamentally broken[/i]. Noting that most heroic monsters from the original MM are in fact still okay. There are some stupid things (Bloodfire Harpies and Needlefang Drakes) but in general they are functional. New Kobolds are new options, because many MM heroic tier monsters are still perfectly viable (Dragonshield Kobolds for example). Now when we get into the paragon and [i]especially[/i] epic monsters - many of whom are so useless not even upgrading their damage helps - we have a problem. Most MM elites and solos are worthless after heroic tier. Orcus is arguably the biggest joke in all of 4E for an epic level end of game threat. Most regular MM high paragon and epic monsters are nowhere near competitive with an epic party (damage and power wise). Compare high level monsters from MM3 like Forsaken or Tulgar with just about anything high level (level 21+) in the original MM. Heck compare similar epic tier monsters in MM2 to MM1. MM2 creatures have better power design, so frequently all you have to do is change damage maths and bam, you're done. I mean, what Wizards are saying about the PHB and DMG is 100% true. What they are saying about the MM just rings absolutely hollow to me. It's a fundamentally broken book, with many creatures being useless (minions, many solos, some elites) and others being so far behind the curve they aren't worthwhile using. Of course it's worth noting I feel this is [i]only[/i] for most creatures in paragon and beyond. That's where the gaping flaws show up and those are the creatures that perform the worst. Since the MM3 has come out I've used monsters almost exclusively from it and the MM2 (with adjusted maths). I rarely use creatures from the original MM after heroic tier at all and I never touch the solos in the book. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
A subtle reminder from wizards.(or not so subtle)
Top