Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Imaro" data-source="post: 5264565" data-attributes="member: 48965">1. Ok, whatever... <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f615.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":confused:" title="Confused&nbsp; &nbsp; :confused:"&nbsp; data-smilie="5"data-shortname=":confused:" />&nbsp;2. I never said anyone was &quot;taking&quot; my opinion... how do you take someone's opinion in this context anyway??? --&gt; unclear meaning!&nbsp;3. How about...I belong to the people who think critically and ask questions instead of accepting whatever they are told. Now how about I say you belong to the people who just blindly accept whatever they are told by WotC, without questioning or wondering about anything (see how negative classification can work both ways?). Not sure &quot;What is ok&quot; means in this context either...&nbsp;4. Yes overreacting is posting one's opinions on D&amp;D essentials... in a forum dedicated to posting your opinions on D&amp;D... in a thread about D&amp;D essentials... <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f615.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":confused:" title="Confused&nbsp; &nbsp; :confused:"&nbsp; data-smilie="5"data-shortname=":confused:" /> &nbsp;So I guess the only way I could not &quot;overreact&quot;, according to you, is if I didn't post my opinions... but it's ok to post that you believe everything WotC has said... and that's not a positive overreaction... Kettle meet pot...&nbsp;5. Accept what? Your opinion? &nbsp;Which leads us back to what's really bugging you... I don't agree with your opinion and instead of addressing the points I've brought up or the unanswered questions I've posed... you've instead attacked me with words like &quot;paranoid&quot; and &quot;overeacting&quot; when my actions have been nothing but the same as everyone else participating in this thread... I mean with the exception of the negative categorization (until now) ascribing of motives, and general attacks you've launched at me for stating my opinion and providing evidence for why I think they are valid. Maybe you should ask yourself why what I think about essentials ruffles your feathers so much?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Imaro, post: 5264565, member: 48965"] 1. Ok, whatever... :confused: 2. I never said anyone was "taking" my opinion... how do you take someone's opinion in this context anyway??? --> unclear meaning! 3. How about...I belong to the people who think critically and ask questions instead of accepting whatever they are told. Now how about I say you belong to the people who just blindly accept whatever they are told by WotC, without questioning or wondering about anything (see how negative classification can work both ways?). Not sure "What is ok" means in this context either... 4. Yes overreacting is posting one's opinions on D&D essentials... in a forum dedicated to posting your opinions on D&D... in a thread about D&D essentials... :confused: So I guess the only way I could not "overreact", according to you, is if I didn't post my opinions... but it's ok to post that you believe everything WotC has said... and that's not a positive overreaction... Kettle meet pot... 5. Accept what? Your opinion? Which leads us back to what's really bugging you... I don't agree with your opinion and instead of addressing the points I've brought up or the unanswered questions I've posed... you've instead attacked me with words like "paranoid" and "overeacting" when my actions have been nothing but the same as everyone else participating in this thread... I mean with the exception of the negative categorization (until now) ascribing of motives, and general attacks you've launched at me for stating my opinion and providing evidence for why I think they are valid. Maybe you should ask yourself why what I think about essentials ruffles your feathers so much? [/QUOTE]

Verification