Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
A subtle reminder from wizards.(or not so subtle)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CountPopeula" data-source="post: 5266476" data-attributes="member: 27250"><p>I think that a lot of the arguing just comes from people having differing definitions on what a "revision/new edition/whatever term we're using" means. To a lot of people, it means "everything that came before this is obsolete." To some people it doesn't.</p><p></p><p>And I think the implication with the whole "I heard this from some guy on the internet" thing about the original core books being discontinued is that that the older builds for the classes are now disallowed or somehow mechanically broken against the revised rules. The fact of the matter is that there's a mad number of options for the classes in the PHB1. A quick count of level 1 fighter at-wills gave me 16, of which a given fighter can know 2, or 3 if he's human. At some point the focus should move away from them a little bit and on to new classes.</p><p></p><p>I really think we'd have had a lot less of this "OMG 4.5!" stuff if the classes in Essentials just had new names. Of course the way they did it, they get new classes and some of the powers are available to the old ones, so established players have more incentive to buy it. It looks like Arcane and Divine classes will get the most use, since they're going to have a whole slew of powers the PHB classes can use, while Martial characters will seemingly just get new utilities.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CountPopeula, post: 5266476, member: 27250"] I think that a lot of the arguing just comes from people having differing definitions on what a "revision/new edition/whatever term we're using" means. To a lot of people, it means "everything that came before this is obsolete." To some people it doesn't. And I think the implication with the whole "I heard this from some guy on the internet" thing about the original core books being discontinued is that that the older builds for the classes are now disallowed or somehow mechanically broken against the revised rules. The fact of the matter is that there's a mad number of options for the classes in the PHB1. A quick count of level 1 fighter at-wills gave me 16, of which a given fighter can know 2, or 3 if he's human. At some point the focus should move away from them a little bit and on to new classes. I really think we'd have had a lot less of this "OMG 4.5!" stuff if the classes in Essentials just had new names. Of course the way they did it, they get new classes and some of the powers are available to the old ones, so established players have more incentive to buy it. It looks like Arcane and Divine classes will get the most use, since they're going to have a whole slew of powers the PHB classes can use, while Martial characters will seemingly just get new utilities. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
A subtle reminder from wizards.(or not so subtle)
Top