Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
A subtle reminder from wizards.(or not so subtle)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DracoSuave" data-source="post: 5268834" data-attributes="member: 71571"><p>I don't understand how it is obsfucatory.</p><p></p><p>Now, you could make the claim that it is obsfucatory if they didn't put out previews, and when essentials comes out, you see that it completely invalidates everything that came before, and that it is completely incompatible...</p><p></p><p>...but really. Let's be absolutely rational here.</p><p></p><p>Let's assume that Essentials is not a complete game overhaul, that it is just a stripped down starter product with some value to the larger consumer, and that it is fully compatible with the earlier product.</p><p></p><p>Now.</p><p></p><p>How can you say that without it seeming obsfucating? Short of releasing the whole book, what could they possibly do to show you this is not the case?</p><p></p><p>Really.</p><p></p><p>Think about that a moment.</p><p></p><p>The reason I'm not losing my head over this is because they've released this sort of product before. Both TSR -and- Wizards have traditionally liked to create entry level versions of their products. This isn't exactly new, the idea of an entry level product into Dungeons and Dragons is as old as... well... the product itself.</p><p></p><p>The only difference I see this time is that they've made the products alternative builds and ways of playing classes, some of which certain players have asked for and demanded. So not only have they made a started product, they've also made <strong>class variants</strong> that are designed to appeal to certain customers who feel the desire for those variants.</p><p></p><p>That's all it is. They've been up front about this the entire time. This is how they've presented it from day 1.</p><p></p><p>I don't understand what they are obsfucating here. The only obsfucation I see is a lot of people's anti-corporate bias obsfucating their grasp of history and current affairs. Wizards is NOT a company prone to obsfucating or misdirecting customers. It never has been, and there's no reason to see it doing so in the future. Oh, it can change its mind from time to time, but every corporation does that; that's not a betrayal of the customers when it's done openly. Wizards is a -very- transparent company, and the only way you can believe otherwise is if you're not actually paying attention to it.</p><p></p><p>And yeah, I'll even bet my avatar on it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DracoSuave, post: 5268834, member: 71571"] I don't understand how it is obsfucatory. Now, you could make the claim that it is obsfucatory if they didn't put out previews, and when essentials comes out, you see that it completely invalidates everything that came before, and that it is completely incompatible... ...but really. Let's be absolutely rational here. Let's assume that Essentials is not a complete game overhaul, that it is just a stripped down starter product with some value to the larger consumer, and that it is fully compatible with the earlier product. Now. How can you say that without it seeming obsfucating? Short of releasing the whole book, what could they possibly do to show you this is not the case? Really. Think about that a moment. The reason I'm not losing my head over this is because they've released this sort of product before. Both TSR -and- Wizards have traditionally liked to create entry level versions of their products. This isn't exactly new, the idea of an entry level product into Dungeons and Dragons is as old as... well... the product itself. The only difference I see this time is that they've made the products alternative builds and ways of playing classes, some of which certain players have asked for and demanded. So not only have they made a started product, they've also made [b]class variants[/b] that are designed to appeal to certain customers who feel the desire for those variants. That's all it is. They've been up front about this the entire time. This is how they've presented it from day 1. I don't understand what they are obsfucating here. The only obsfucation I see is a lot of people's anti-corporate bias obsfucating their grasp of history and current affairs. Wizards is NOT a company prone to obsfucating or misdirecting customers. It never has been, and there's no reason to see it doing so in the future. Oh, it can change its mind from time to time, but every corporation does that; that's not a betrayal of the customers when it's done openly. Wizards is a -very- transparent company, and the only way you can believe otherwise is if you're not actually paying attention to it. And yeah, I'll even bet my avatar on it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
A subtle reminder from wizards.(or not so subtle)
Top