Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
A Thought
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jgbrowning" data-source="post: 2419419" data-attributes="member: 5724"><p>So am I. I think I failed to express myself very well. So I'll try again. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>I know all laws are are codified behavior, or an explaination of "what happens" not really "why it happens". In other words, gravity works because it works and we're trying to find out more of "why" even though we're pretty good at predicting whats going to happen and what has/will happen.</p><p></p><p>What I'm postulating (and what is different than the gravity anology) is an unknowable "how" that unlike our world constantly changes reasons for "how."</p><p></p><p>Its like this. There is level A where players interact with magic and things work based upon laws and principles, but underneath that layer, the layer of "do this and this happens" there is an unpaternable series of events that causes the above layer. Layer A is understandable by us, but layer B is forever unfathomable, even though it's obvious that layer B somehow always makes layer A work in the same way.</p><p></p><p>I guess I'm questioning the basic scientific concept of cauality when applied to magic- perhaps every action doesn't have an equal and opposite reaction and only the single layer the players understand as magic is predictive, but beyond that, magic <em>itself</em> cannot be understood because there's simply no pattern of cause and effect.</p><p></p><p>To make an extended example: Fireball requires some bat guano and some words and some gestures. Perhaps those words and gestures aren't the same everytime (one wizard's fireball is different than another wizard's or even one wizard's casting of fireball is different from one casting to the next), perhaps the magic is really transforming (i know it's evocation) the bat guano into the fireball one time, but is opening up a planar rift another time, and yet something different the next time and the next.</p><p></p><p>Perhaps there's only one layer of understandability that's based solely on trial-and-error, not upon logic concering cause and effect, or the concept of scientific laws and priciples (consistant, predicable action).</p><p></p><p>Hrm, here's an anology you'll probably get. It's like blacksmithing for someone in the middle ages, but with the idea that there is no replicatable molecular interactions occuring although the result (say a higher quality iron) is achievable. The only way to get a better iron (better spell) is through trial and error and not through understanding the underlying priciples of metalurgy because they are not replicatable, although the result is once the trial-and-error turns into trial-and-succeed. There's no using science to understand the underlying priciples to make a better iron, since the underlying principles are utterly random, even though the results that occur from the utter randomness are predictable.</p><p></p><p>OK, this is <strong>slightly</strong> <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> off topic, but relates in that the predictability of magic in the game system makes all other magics a matter of trial and error and not one of scientific investigation because all other layers are random. There's many ways to read the systems magic rules as "how things work" without extrapolating that things work the same way up and down the ladders of causality.</p><p></p><p>joe b.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jgbrowning, post: 2419419, member: 5724"] So am I. I think I failed to express myself very well. So I'll try again. :) I know all laws are are codified behavior, or an explaination of "what happens" not really "why it happens". In other words, gravity works because it works and we're trying to find out more of "why" even though we're pretty good at predicting whats going to happen and what has/will happen. What I'm postulating (and what is different than the gravity anology) is an unknowable "how" that unlike our world constantly changes reasons for "how." Its like this. There is level A where players interact with magic and things work based upon laws and principles, but underneath that layer, the layer of "do this and this happens" there is an unpaternable series of events that causes the above layer. Layer A is understandable by us, but layer B is forever unfathomable, even though it's obvious that layer B somehow always makes layer A work in the same way. I guess I'm questioning the basic scientific concept of cauality when applied to magic- perhaps every action doesn't have an equal and opposite reaction and only the single layer the players understand as magic is predictive, but beyond that, magic [i]itself[/i] cannot be understood because there's simply no pattern of cause and effect. To make an extended example: Fireball requires some bat guano and some words and some gestures. Perhaps those words and gestures aren't the same everytime (one wizard's fireball is different than another wizard's or even one wizard's casting of fireball is different from one casting to the next), perhaps the magic is really transforming (i know it's evocation) the bat guano into the fireball one time, but is opening up a planar rift another time, and yet something different the next time and the next. Perhaps there's only one layer of understandability that's based solely on trial-and-error, not upon logic concering cause and effect, or the concept of scientific laws and priciples (consistant, predicable action). Hrm, here's an anology you'll probably get. It's like blacksmithing for someone in the middle ages, but with the idea that there is no replicatable molecular interactions occuring although the result (say a higher quality iron) is achievable. The only way to get a better iron (better spell) is through trial and error and not through understanding the underlying priciples of metalurgy because they are not replicatable, although the result is once the trial-and-error turns into trial-and-succeed. There's no using science to understand the underlying priciples to make a better iron, since the underlying principles are utterly random, even though the results that occur from the utter randomness are predictable. OK, this is [b]slightly[/b] :) off topic, but relates in that the predictability of magic in the game system makes all other magics a matter of trial and error and not one of scientific investigation because all other layers are random. There's many ways to read the systems magic rules as "how things work" without extrapolating that things work the same way up and down the ladders of causality. joe b. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
A Thought
Top