Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Ahglock" data-source="post: 3921181" data-attributes="member: 56725">I guess I consider myself neutral on it.I like the idea behind per encounter maneuvers for all the classes.&nbsp; While i loved the style of vancian magic it only really worked if you had enough encounters per day that people had to conserve there spells and use them wisely.&nbsp; I believe the per encounter mechanic can fit a much wider range of game styles, and it will hopefully allow al classes to pull off really cool stunts.&nbsp;&nbsp; I'm not happy when I hear about things being cut for a later book.&nbsp; Especially when those things cut are fairly basic fantasy concepts, that were previously core.&nbsp; I even more especially don't like it when it was cut for reasons other than space.&nbsp; And i get more frustrated when things seem like they are getting perma cut because they didn't spend the time to fix them,so its just a cut which is easier.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Ahglock, post: 3921181, member: 56725"] I guess I consider myself neutral on it. I like the idea behind per encounter maneuvers for all the classes. While i loved the style of vancian magic it only really worked if you had enough encounters per day that people had to conserve there spells and use them wisely. I believe the per encounter mechanic can fit a much wider range of game styles, and it will hopefully allow al classes to pull off really cool stunts. I'm not happy when I hear about things being cut for a later book. Especially when those things cut are fairly basic fantasy concepts, that were previously core. I even more especially don't like it when it was cut for reasons other than space. And i get more frustrated when things seem like they are getting perma cut because they didn't spend the time to fix them,so its just a cut which is easier. [/QUOTE]

Verification