Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Lwaxy" data-source="post: 5856529" data-attributes="member: 53286">The RAW have always been mostly a suggestion to me <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f60e.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":cool:" title="Cool&nbsp; &nbsp; :cool:"&nbsp; data-smilie="6"data-shortname=":cool:" /> The problem is, in the &quot;good old times&quot; when I got interested players they asked about how our rules looked like. Essentially, every DM made their own. Nowadays, it is mostly expected you follow the RAW, and have only a few house rules. Well, our games ARE house rules (with few exceptions) based on the RAW framework of all editions and PF <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin&nbsp; &nbsp; :D"&nbsp; data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /> Sometimes makes it harder to get new players, but then we don't need any more players at the moment. I suppose we would drop a lot of those &quot;speed the game up&quot; house rules if 5e could accomplish the same.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Lwaxy, post: 5856529, member: 53286"] The RAW have always been mostly a suggestion to me :cool: The problem is, in the "good old times" when I got interested players they asked about how our rules looked like. Essentially, every DM made their own. Nowadays, it is mostly expected you follow the RAW, and have only a few house rules. Well, our games ARE house rules (with few exceptions) based on the RAW framework of all editions and PF :D Sometimes makes it harder to get new players, but then we don't need any more players at the moment. I suppose we would drop a lot of those "speed the game up" house rules if 5e could accomplish the same. [/QUOTE]

Verification