Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Sadrik" data-source="post: 3107279" data-attributes="member: 14506">Well, my thought here is big creatures generally have a huge natural armor bonus. How much benefit should I give to them? I am very tempted to halve natural armor bonuses because of it too. A +30 natural armor bonus converts to a +30 bonus to saves vs damage. That means that characters would have to do >30 damage to be effective. A spell can do that pretty easy. But a melee guy... Lets see A +3 holy great axe with a +8 strength mod.Base 10great axe +6magic +3holy +6strength +12for 37 damageTo damage a +30 DR creature the creature would have to roll a "6" or less. I guess that seems about right. No need to halve natural armor bonuses.Sure a fine (mouse sized) barbarian should have less wounds... Right now I am in flux on how many wounds characters and creatures should get. But so far my best idea is: 1/2HD + BAB + 2 + size mod (minimum of 1). So a size-fine 4th level barbarian would have 4 wounds (because: 6HD + 4BAB + 2 - 8 = 4). Definatly not a lot of wounds but more than I suspected.I think the possibility of amazing things happening should be there. Of course the DM should be able to say no in certain situations. Objects always "taking a 10" makes sense anyway.</blockquote>