Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Mistwell" data-source="post: 7792450" data-attributes="member: 2525">Oh for the love of... your original scenario COULD NOT USE TWF OR PAM BECAUSE YOU SAID DUELING AND NO FEATS! So WHAT could you have been using to give them a bonus action attack every round in your original scenario? We're over 200 posts in now, and the mystery ability still hasn't been revealed. This is what people mean when they say you're arguing in bad faith - there was NOTHING you were using to get that bonus action. It doesn't exist for that original scenario.This is also absurd. Of course &quot;how you got there&quot; is relevant. You could just add +100 damage to all Ranger attacks and say &quot;how I got there is irrelevant&quot; if that were the case. If a scenario you propose is LITERALLY IMPOSSIBLY UNDER THE RULES that is friggen &quot;relevant&quot; to whether the rules are unbalanced! And you were CORRECTING people when they tried to use feats for the fighter - which is an ability they get that no other class gets (extra feats). You tried to force a &quot;no feats&quot; rule on the thread when you were the one using feats!</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Mistwell, post: 7792450, member: 2525"] Oh for the love of... your original scenario COULD NOT USE TWF OR PAM BECAUSE YOU SAID DUELING AND NO FEATS! So WHAT could you have been using to give them a bonus action attack every round in your original scenario? We're over 200 posts in now, and the mystery ability still hasn't been revealed. This is what people mean when they say you're arguing in bad faith - there was NOTHING you were using to get that bonus action. It doesn't exist for that original scenario. This is also absurd. Of course "how you got there" is relevant. You could just add +100 damage to all Ranger attacks and say "how I got there is irrelevant" if that were the case. If a scenario you propose is LITERALLY IMPOSSIBLY UNDER THE RULES that is friggen "relevant" to whether the rules are unbalanced! And you were CORRECTING people when they tried to use feats for the fighter - which is an ability they get that no other class gets (extra feats). You tried to force a "no feats" rule on the thread when you were the one using feats! [/QUOTE]

Verification