Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="DND_Reborn" data-source="post: 7968556" data-attributes="member: 6987520">Yeah, I thought of that as well. But I suppose a lot depends on the playstyle. For instance, in our games, Paladins aren't smiting all the time (it is a limited resource after all). And remember, at higher levels with Extra Attack, spending one turn to cast True Strike means you are losing out on two attacks that round. If you hit on those, you could have smited and maybe ended the battle already? shrugFinally, Rogues and Paladins don't have True Strike. So, unless you are using MCing and/or Feats, they can't do it. Even with the new UA-classfeatures option, you won't get it as a Paladin as Blessed Warrior requires choosing Cleric Cantrips.Now, I know most tables play with MCing and/or Feats, but balancing things out from the base design perspective I think it would work ok. Obviously, it would require some more thought and play-testing, but that is my initial thought FWIW.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="DND_Reborn, post: 7968556, member: 6987520"] Yeah, I thought of that as well. But I suppose a lot depends on the playstyle. For instance, in our games, Paladins aren't smiting all the time (it is a limited resource after all). And remember, at higher levels with Extra Attack, spending one turn to cast True Strike means you are losing out on [I]two[/I] attacks that round. If you hit on those, you could have smited and maybe ended the battle already? [I]shrug[/I] Finally, Rogues and Paladins don't have True Strike. So, unless you are using MCing and/or Feats, they can't do it. Even with the new UA-classfeatures option, you won't get it as a Paladin as Blessed Warrior requires choosing Cleric Cantrips. Now, I know most tables play with MCing and/or Feats, but balancing things out from the base design perspective I think it would work ok. Obviously, it would require some more thought and play-testing, but that is my initial thought FWIW. [/QUOTE]

Verification