Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Nyaricus" data-source="post: 2767174" data-attributes="member: 35678">Neat idea for the addition or Barb and Monk-ish elements - prolly the easiest thing to do would be mnaking Rage based on a fort Requirtement, adn Fast Movement based off of Ref Save - and don't let the increases keep going and going. Go with 4 Steps in the Rage line (per the PHB barb), adn 4 in the Fast Movement (adding&nbsp; 10, 20, 30 and then 40 to base speed [these would overlap one-another, not stack]. You could do this with a few other things . . . . but not too many.Interestingh idea, just make sure it's balanced.Not too familiar with Style rules, but yeah, PrC's can make all the difference. My suggestion here is to make sure you have a lot of pidgeion-holed PrC's that have stuff that the base classes could not get anywhere else. The generic classes open up a variety of doors - but they can only do so much. I don't and wouldn't use generic classes, personally (i think that's too much pidegeon-holing) but hey, you definitively have some well-thought out ideas and such here&nbsp;Well, make suer that for spellcasters, the PrC's continue you new Paths idea and as for multiclassing - don't be worried about it. Some might take expert for skills, and then go with Warrior for fighting skills. It wouldn't be any more abused than what happens now - same stuff, different way.and as for ^that^ comment, it's getting added to my quoteable quotes section of my Tasty Bits Thread. Thanks for that <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin&nbsp; &nbsp; :D"&nbsp; data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" />Hope that helps you out a bit - I'd love to see more of what you ahve layed out for use to critque, BTW.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Nyaricus, post: 2767174, member: 35678"] Neat idea for the addition or Barb and Monk-ish elements - prolly the easiest thing to do would be mnaking Rage based on a fort Requirtement, adn Fast Movement based off of Ref Save - and don't let the increases keep going and going. Go with 4 Steps in the Rage line (per the PHB barb), adn 4 in the Fast Movement (adding 10, 20, 30 and then 40 to base speed [these would overlap one-another, not stack]. You could do this with a few other things . . . . but not too many. Interestingh idea, just make sure it's balanced. Not too familiar with Style rules, but yeah, PrC's [i]can[/i] make all the difference. My suggestion here is to make sure you have a lot of pidgeion-holed PrC's that have stuff that the base classes could [b]not[/b] get anywhere else. The generic classes open up a variety of doors - but they can only do so much. I don't and wouldn't use generic classes, personally (i think that's [b]too[/b] much pidegeon-holing) but hey, you definitively have some well-thought out ideas and such here Well, make suer that for spellcasters, the PrC's continue you new Paths idea and as for multiclassing - don't be worried about it. Some might take expert for skills, and then go with Warrior for fighting skills. It wouldn't be any more abused than what happens now - same stuff, different way. and as for ^that^ comment, it's getting added to my quoteable quotes section of my Tasty Bits Thread. Thanks for that :D Hope that helps you out a bit - I'd love to see more of what you ahve layed out for use to critque, BTW. [/QUOTE]

Verification