NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Gez" data-source="post: 1245590" data-attributes="member: 1328">If anyone has any balance concern, please, issue feedback.True. I copy/pasted from the SRD the class, and then modified it. The only modification I made was for this "stunt" mechanism; but I also think every class should get access to Craft and Profession skills.Aren't those feats in the feat section? If so, the fighter can still take them whenever he gets a bonus or regular feat. If you mean that I could remove them and replace them with stunts, well, probably. But there are a few other classes that gets Weapon Specialization (like the Psychic Warrior) and they would be deprived of these choices if I turned GWF and GWS into stunts.Note also the existence of Weapon Mastery that is like GWS."At eighth level, and every four fighter levels thereafter, a figther may learn a special stunt instead of taking a bonus feat."A fighter may select a stunt, or a feat -- not both.Stunts can only be made with weapon the fighter is already specialized with. If I replaced these feats by stunts, and allowed the fighter to get a stunt that is a feat; then nitpicking would say he gets to use this feat only with his specialized weapon(s). For example, an archer that takes precise shot at level 8 with a stunt would be denied the benefit of this feat when using a crossbow. This would be replacing a strength by a weakness, that's why I decided to keep the things the other way -- a feat, or a stunt; rather than a stunt that may be a feat. I hope this isn't worded in a too confusing way.<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> Thanks everyone!</blockquote>

Verification