Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
A Way for Players to Roll Hidden Checks
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hawk Diesel" data-source="post: 9832694" data-attributes="member: 59848"><p>Something I have previously struggled with as a DM is how to hide the success or failure of a check from the players. Obviously, there is the hidden roll where the DM makes the roll on the player's behalf behind the screen. But in my experience, it's more fun for the player to roll their own dice. Also, if you are on a VTT, it's a pain as a DM (at least for me) to roll for the player and keep it hidden. But allowing the player to roll can ruin the fun of a check. For example, if a player rolls low on an Arcana check to determine the nature of a scroll, they are gonna assume that the info you give them is suspect. Meanwhile, a player rolling high on a perception check is going to maintain confidence that when they don't see anything in the shadows, there really isn't anything there. So how do you allow the player to roll, while maintaining the mystery of the check?</p><p></p><p>My solution, randomly invert the scale. Prior to calling for the roll, I secretly roll a d4. Evens, the scale is normal. Rolling a 15 is a 15. But if I roll odds, the scale gets inverted. A 20 is treated like a 1. Modifiers also get inverted. A +3 modifier becomes a -3, and vice versa. Now, if a player rolls high, they can't automatically assume the the information the DM provides is accurate. Likewise, the player can also get a better sense of their character's confidence in the check. Checks closer to 10 are lower confidence, but checks closer to 1 or 20 are higher confidence, even when they may be completely wrong.</p><p></p><p>Of course, this isn't meant for checks where success or failure is obvious. If you make an athletics check to clear a ravine, you know if you made it or not. But for information given to your players that could plausibly be uncertain, I've found this to be a fun system. The mystery is maintained, but the players still get to control rolls relevant for their own PCs.</p><p></p><p>I'm interested to hear people's thoughts, whether others have encountered this issue in their own games, and if there are alternative ways people have tried to address it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hawk Diesel, post: 9832694, member: 59848"] Something I have previously struggled with as a DM is how to hide the success or failure of a check from the players. Obviously, there is the hidden roll where the DM makes the roll on the player's behalf behind the screen. But in my experience, it's more fun for the player to roll their own dice. Also, if you are on a VTT, it's a pain as a DM (at least for me) to roll for the player and keep it hidden. But allowing the player to roll can ruin the fun of a check. For example, if a player rolls low on an Arcana check to determine the nature of a scroll, they are gonna assume that the info you give them is suspect. Meanwhile, a player rolling high on a perception check is going to maintain confidence that when they don't see anything in the shadows, there really isn't anything there. So how do you allow the player to roll, while maintaining the mystery of the check? My solution, randomly invert the scale. Prior to calling for the roll, I secretly roll a d4. Evens, the scale is normal. Rolling a 15 is a 15. But if I roll odds, the scale gets inverted. A 20 is treated like a 1. Modifiers also get inverted. A +3 modifier becomes a -3, and vice versa. Now, if a player rolls high, they can't automatically assume the the information the DM provides is accurate. Likewise, the player can also get a better sense of their character's confidence in the check. Checks closer to 10 are lower confidence, but checks closer to 1 or 20 are higher confidence, even when they may be completely wrong. Of course, this isn't meant for checks where success or failure is obvious. If you make an athletics check to clear a ravine, you know if you made it or not. But for information given to your players that could plausibly be uncertain, I've found this to be a fun system. The mystery is maintained, but the players still get to control rolls relevant for their own PCs. I'm interested to hear people's thoughts, whether others have encountered this issue in their own games, and if there are alternative ways people have tried to address it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
A Way for Players to Roll Hidden Checks
Top