Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
A Whirlwind Question
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Coredump" data-source="post: 2293353" data-attributes="member: 6939"><p>Hey Treebore, good to see you in the thread.</p><p></p><p>I will try and approach this from a different angle. Lets assume you are correct, and the intent was "bonuses or extra attacks, from feats or abiities" NOw lets see what happens.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Interesting. But if 'bonuses' and 'extra attacks' are separate, they should be treated the same. And it clearly states that extra attacks from spells do not apply, so shouldn't it also mean that bonuses from spells do not apply?</p><p></p><p> But that seems like a pretty stacked scenario. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It can, but at 9th level, you get two attacks, if you drop someone you get a third attack. Which means you need to be surronded by 4 people before Whirlwind is better. And that seems to happen less often that fighting 2 or 3 people. (granted, with one it doesn't matter.) And those times you *are* surronded by that many, they are usually much lower level, and you are more likely to get off a string of cleaves.</p><p></p><p> Yet your example below has the fighter WW for 25+, and you say a single attack for 38 (and it should be higher...)</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Actually, it would be 24 damage. (9+7+5+1+2) But this is allowing spell affects.</p><p></p><p></p><p>He is already doing 24 pts, and you are worried about the extra few from feats? (Remember, power attack isn't a straight + to damage, since it lowers your to hit). The big pain here isn't the whirlwind, it is the 2d6 bane weapons.</p><p></p><p>But here is the kicker. You are saying all bonuses from feats and abilities. If that is what they meant, than it means all feats. And it *doesn't* say just damage. So forget about weapon focus, or blind fighting, and best of all, 'proficiency' is a feat. So they get the -4 if they don't get the bonus from that feat. (or from the class ability)</p><p></p><p>So, if you want to read it like that, you also have to ignore all spells that give bonuses, and *all* feats that give *any* bonus. Seems like a lot for an assumed grammar error.</p><p></p><p></p><p> That would be "38-50+" to one creature. And yes, Spike chain/whirlwind is a powerful combo, I think it is more of a spike chain problem though.</p><p></p><p> So looks like Great CLeave did more damage than Whirlwind.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I don't have a problem with your ruling, but it seems like you are not being consistent with your presumptions.</p><p></p><p>Have fun.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Coredump, post: 2293353, member: 6939"] Hey Treebore, good to see you in the thread. I will try and approach this from a different angle. Lets assume you are correct, and the intent was "bonuses or extra attacks, from feats or abiities" NOw lets see what happens. Interesting. But if 'bonuses' and 'extra attacks' are separate, they should be treated the same. And it clearly states that extra attacks from spells do not apply, so shouldn't it also mean that bonuses from spells do not apply? But that seems like a pretty stacked scenario. It can, but at 9th level, you get two attacks, if you drop someone you get a third attack. Which means you need to be surronded by 4 people before Whirlwind is better. And that seems to happen less often that fighting 2 or 3 people. (granted, with one it doesn't matter.) And those times you *are* surronded by that many, they are usually much lower level, and you are more likely to get off a string of cleaves. Yet your example below has the fighter WW for 25+, and you say a single attack for 38 (and it should be higher...) Actually, it would be 24 damage. (9+7+5+1+2) But this is allowing spell affects. He is already doing 24 pts, and you are worried about the extra few from feats? (Remember, power attack isn't a straight + to damage, since it lowers your to hit). The big pain here isn't the whirlwind, it is the 2d6 bane weapons. But here is the kicker. You are saying all bonuses from feats and abilities. If that is what they meant, than it means all feats. And it *doesn't* say just damage. So forget about weapon focus, or blind fighting, and best of all, 'proficiency' is a feat. So they get the -4 if they don't get the bonus from that feat. (or from the class ability) So, if you want to read it like that, you also have to ignore all spells that give bonuses, and *all* feats that give *any* bonus. Seems like a lot for an assumed grammar error. That would be "38-50+" to one creature. And yes, Spike chain/whirlwind is a powerful combo, I think it is more of a spike chain problem though. So looks like Great CLeave did more damage than Whirlwind. I don't have a problem with your ruling, but it seems like you are not being consistent with your presumptions. Have fun. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
A Whirlwind Question
Top