Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
A Whirlwind Question
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FireLance" data-source="post: 2295945" data-attributes="member: 3424"><p>I think it all depends on what you consider to be a "challenge".</p><p></p><p>From the perspective of the game, a "challenge" uses up party resources. These resources can be anything - spells, hit points, daily use class abilities, magic item charges, etc. </p><p></p><p>Just because the party hasn't lost hit points, it doesn't mean that the encounter wasn't a challenge, if the party used up spells, class abilities, etc. A party can be relatively uninjured and still low on resources because its spells, daily use abilities, etc. are almost used up. I was in such a situation once, and warned my fellow players that we should retreat to rest. They ignored me and the next encounter almost resulted in a TPK. :\</p><p></p><p>Similarly, just because the party defeats the opponents easily, it doesn't mean that the encounter wasn't a challenge, if the party used up spells, class abilities, got injured, etc. It seems to me that in order for your party to defeat the opponents easily, they did use a fair number of their resources - bardic music, buff spells, and possibly hit points as well.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Several people, including myself, see Great Cleave as one of the least useful feats in the game. Perhaps it is because the games that we play tend to feature fewer and more powerful opponents than more, weaker opponents. Ideally, of course, a game should feature both types of encounters.</p><p></p><p>Look at it in terms of spells. Games which feature fewer, but more powerful opponents would tend to favor spells that deal a large amount of damage to a single opponent like <em>disintegrate</em>. Games that feature more, but less powerful opponents would tend to favor spells that deal less damage to a larger number of creatures, like <em>fireball</em>. However, it doesn't mean that either spell is unbalanced.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Resource expenditure for fighter-types and other characters who can use their abilities an unlimited number of times per day is quite different from spellcasters and other characters whose abilities have daily use limits. The only real limitation is hit points, which is what they risk losing every time they get within range of a melee or ranged attack (whether or not the attack hits). They shouldn't be expected to have the same resource depletion curve as spellcasters.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>As long as you and your players are having fun, you're not doing anything wrong. I'm just hoping to persuade you that Whirlwind Attack isn't that bad in general, although it might not be right for your game.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FireLance, post: 2295945, member: 3424"] I think it all depends on what you consider to be a "challenge". From the perspective of the game, a "challenge" uses up party resources. These resources can be anything - spells, hit points, daily use class abilities, magic item charges, etc. Just because the party hasn't lost hit points, it doesn't mean that the encounter wasn't a challenge, if the party used up spells, class abilities, etc. A party can be relatively uninjured and still low on resources because its spells, daily use abilities, etc. are almost used up. I was in such a situation once, and warned my fellow players that we should retreat to rest. They ignored me and the next encounter almost resulted in a TPK. :\ Similarly, just because the party defeats the opponents easily, it doesn't mean that the encounter wasn't a challenge, if the party used up spells, class abilities, got injured, etc. It seems to me that in order for your party to defeat the opponents easily, they did use a fair number of their resources - bardic music, buff spells, and possibly hit points as well. Several people, including myself, see Great Cleave as one of the least useful feats in the game. Perhaps it is because the games that we play tend to feature fewer and more powerful opponents than more, weaker opponents. Ideally, of course, a game should feature both types of encounters. Look at it in terms of spells. Games which feature fewer, but more powerful opponents would tend to favor spells that deal a large amount of damage to a single opponent like [I]disintegrate[/I]. Games that feature more, but less powerful opponents would tend to favor spells that deal less damage to a larger number of creatures, like [I]fireball[/I]. However, it doesn't mean that either spell is unbalanced. Resource expenditure for fighter-types and other characters who can use their abilities an unlimited number of times per day is quite different from spellcasters and other characters whose abilities have daily use limits. The only real limitation is hit points, which is what they risk losing every time they get within range of a melee or ranged attack (whether or not the attack hits). They shouldn't be expected to have the same resource depletion curve as spellcasters. As long as you and your players are having fun, you're not doing anything wrong. I'm just hoping to persuade you that Whirlwind Attack isn't that bad in general, although it might not be right for your game. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
A Whirlwind Question
Top