Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
A worry about "special case monster abilities"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jaer" data-source="post: 4038904" data-attributes="member: 57861"><p>Indeed. The biggest problem is that grappling was not an effective deterent from attacking people in the grapple. For the most part, it sucked to grapple someone. Villian starts a grapple and suddenly he </p><p>- isn't threatening</p><p>- has no dex (sneak attackable!)</p><p>- no movement</p><p>- reduced to natural or light weapons</p><p>- can't cast (for the most part)</p><p>- has a 50% chance of not being hit by missile weapons</p><p></p><p>In the typical 3e fights (4 PCs vs 1 bad guy), getting into a grapple was pretty much doom! If a monster didn't have Swallow Whole, there was rarely a reason for a creature to grapple. There are more negatives to it that benefits. if the monster had rake or some other attack when the grapple happened, I would always Imp Grab, rake, drop the grapple. There was no reason to maintain it from round to round.</p><p></p><p>Why is it that only missile attacks have a chance to hit either opponent in a grapple? If two people are tusselling in the same square, a sword strike could hit either. Any attack against equal sized opponents should have a chance to hit either. If an opponent is 1 size larger, make it a 75%/25% chance; 2 larger, no chance to not hit the one you want.</p><p></p><p>I understand the opponets lacking dex, but no way should that allow for a sneak attack...how can you line up a stab to the liver if the opponent keeps shufflinf around and his liver is covered by your friend?</p><p></p><p>Once an opponet is pinned by your friend, there should be no chance to hit your friend (but if your friend is being attacked, it can still hit either, your friend being able to cover himself with the pinned opponent) and sneak attacks should be viable against the one who is pinned. Movement should be slowed, but doable.</p><p></p><p>It should be like any hostage situation, really - the bad guy has the peasent girl pinned and is using her to defend himself from the PCs. If they attack him, they stand a good chance of hitting the girl instead.</p><p></p><p>That is how I would like to see the grapple rules changed. I don't think a grapple was beneficial enough for most creatures (even ones with Imp Grab) or PCs engage in one. Pinning was like the poor-man's Hold Person. You could try to get out of either every round, but a wizard drops a Hold Person and the target is held; wizard goes on to blast other people with spells. Monk pins an opponet, it takes 2 rounds, and now the monk can do nothing more than maintain the pin, taking themselves out of combat.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jaer, post: 4038904, member: 57861"] Indeed. The biggest problem is that grappling was not an effective deterent from attacking people in the grapple. For the most part, it sucked to grapple someone. Villian starts a grapple and suddenly he - isn't threatening - has no dex (sneak attackable!) - no movement - reduced to natural or light weapons - can't cast (for the most part) - has a 50% chance of not being hit by missile weapons In the typical 3e fights (4 PCs vs 1 bad guy), getting into a grapple was pretty much doom! If a monster didn't have Swallow Whole, there was rarely a reason for a creature to grapple. There are more negatives to it that benefits. if the monster had rake or some other attack when the grapple happened, I would always Imp Grab, rake, drop the grapple. There was no reason to maintain it from round to round. Why is it that only missile attacks have a chance to hit either opponent in a grapple? If two people are tusselling in the same square, a sword strike could hit either. Any attack against equal sized opponents should have a chance to hit either. If an opponent is 1 size larger, make it a 75%/25% chance; 2 larger, no chance to not hit the one you want. I understand the opponets lacking dex, but no way should that allow for a sneak attack...how can you line up a stab to the liver if the opponent keeps shufflinf around and his liver is covered by your friend? Once an opponet is pinned by your friend, there should be no chance to hit your friend (but if your friend is being attacked, it can still hit either, your friend being able to cover himself with the pinned opponent) and sneak attacks should be viable against the one who is pinned. Movement should be slowed, but doable. It should be like any hostage situation, really - the bad guy has the peasent girl pinned and is using her to defend himself from the PCs. If they attack him, they stand a good chance of hitting the girl instead. That is how I would like to see the grapple rules changed. I don't think a grapple was beneficial enough for most creatures (even ones with Imp Grab) or PCs engage in one. Pinning was like the poor-man's Hold Person. You could try to get out of either every round, but a wizard drops a Hold Person and the target is held; wizard goes on to blast other people with spells. Monk pins an opponet, it takes 2 rounds, and now the monk can do nothing more than maintain the pin, taking themselves out of combat. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
A worry about "special case monster abilities"
Top