Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
A Wrought Iron Fence Made of Tigers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Carnivorous_Bean" data-source="post: 4481181" data-attributes="member: 57974"><p>I pretty much agree with Kamikaze Midget.</p><p></p><p>One of my major gripes with 4th edition is that the character classes are now purely wads of combat abilities, and you're supposed to just extemporize everything else. </p><p></p><p>For example, a rogue is no longer someone good at sneaking, stealing, disarming traps, disguising themselves, finding information, climbing, hiding, etc. A rogue is now "do damage, do damage, do damage" -- nothing but another variety of fighter.</p><p></p><p>In fact, everything is now a variety of fighter, variants of two basic fighters -- ranged fighter and melee fighter.</p><p></p><p>Everything is defined by combat. You often can't heal someone without smashing something on the head. There are very few class powers that you would ever use out of combat. Just looking at a 3.5 class, you perceive it as a representation of a creature which could exist outside a battle. Looking at a 4.0 class, you see nothing but a wargame piece's statistics.</p><p></p><p>Yes, I know you're supposed to add everything else in yourself. However, I can do exactly that with a game of Sorry or Monopoly. I can make up whatever individual personality and background I want for the individual pieces, there, too. But that doesn't make Sorry or Monopoly a set of role-playing rules, and to a great extent ,that's also true of 4.0's rules.</p><p></p><p>They've been abstracted to the point where they mean nothing except as a game, like the pips on dice in craps or the spades on a card in bridge. <strong>They are so divorced from representing anything</strong> that it's impossible to consider 4th edition to be a role-playing game any more -- it's an abstract wargame. </p><p></p><p>Yes, you <strong>can</strong> role-play with it, but only in the same sense as you can role-play with chess saying "hah! My pawn just took your pawn -- and that really represents him sneaking up through the bushes and shooting him with a crossbow!" That <strong>is </strong>role-playing, <u><em>but it does not make chess itself a role-playing game.</em></u> Precisely the same is true of 4th edition D&D.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Carnivorous_Bean, post: 4481181, member: 57974"] I pretty much agree with Kamikaze Midget. One of my major gripes with 4th edition is that the character classes are now purely wads of combat abilities, and you're supposed to just extemporize everything else. For example, a rogue is no longer someone good at sneaking, stealing, disarming traps, disguising themselves, finding information, climbing, hiding, etc. A rogue is now "do damage, do damage, do damage" -- nothing but another variety of fighter. In fact, everything is now a variety of fighter, variants of two basic fighters -- ranged fighter and melee fighter. Everything is defined by combat. You often can't heal someone without smashing something on the head. There are very few class powers that you would ever use out of combat. Just looking at a 3.5 class, you perceive it as a representation of a creature which could exist outside a battle. Looking at a 4.0 class, you see nothing but a wargame piece's statistics. Yes, I know you're supposed to add everything else in yourself. However, I can do exactly that with a game of Sorry or Monopoly. I can make up whatever individual personality and background I want for the individual pieces, there, too. But that doesn't make Sorry or Monopoly a set of role-playing rules, and to a great extent ,that's also true of 4.0's rules. They've been abstracted to the point where they mean nothing except as a game, like the pips on dice in craps or the spades on a card in bridge. [B]They are so divorced from representing anything[/B] that it's impossible to consider 4th edition to be a role-playing game any more -- it's an abstract wargame. Yes, you [B]can[/B] role-play with it, but only in the same sense as you can role-play with chess saying "hah! My pawn just took your pawn -- and that really represents him sneaking up through the bushes and shooting him with a crossbow!" That [B]is [/B]role-playing, [U][I]but it does not make chess itself a role-playing game.[/I][/U] Precisely the same is true of 4th edition D&D. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
A Wrought Iron Fence Made of Tigers
Top