Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Kinematics" data-source="post: 8761698" data-attributes="member: 6932123">First, the layout is really nice. I like how you've arranged things.Comments:<ul>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">Maybe increase the size of the inset box for the attributes a bit.</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">Are the proficiency and expertise boxes supposed to be toggles (like expertise from O5E)? Or is Expertise supposed to hold the expertise die value (as used in A5E)? Radio buttons might work better for toggles. If they're supposed to hold expertise die values, perhaps improve the size a little.</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">It's interesting that the saves are in a separate area than the attributes themselves, yet at the same time I can see it being more useful. There's less confusion about what you're looking for, which has certainly been an issue I've seen in my games.</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">On page 2, the actions/bonus actions/reactions lists are nice, though I'm confused about the placement and reading of &quot;Attack&quot; and &quot;DC&quot; (plus, is it redundant with the attack bonuses box?). I'm also not sure about the Cost/Freq column, as anything I can think of that would need that information would need a lot more space than that little line.</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">Also on page 2, the top row of stuff (speeds, spell slots, etc) is good, and the limited use abilities is good to have (I added that to my own character sheet variant), but I've found that limited use abilities need a lot more space than the little box would allow for.</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">Given the overflow for actions/bonus actions/reactions on page 3, it may be better to treat them as just belonging on page 3, and reconsider what you want to have on page 2. The section for weapon attacks and cantrips, in particular, seems sparse and poorly defined.</li>
</ul></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Kinematics, post: 8761698, member: 6932123"] First, the layout is really nice. I like how you've arranged things. Comments: [LIST] [*]Maybe increase the size of the inset box for the attributes a bit. [*]Are the proficiency and expertise boxes supposed to be toggles (like expertise from O5E)? Or is Expertise supposed to hold the expertise die value (as used in A5E)? Radio buttons might work better for toggles. If they're supposed to hold expertise die values, perhaps improve the size a little. [*]It's interesting that the saves are in a separate area than the attributes themselves, yet at the same time I can see it being more useful. There's less confusion about what you're looking for, which has certainly been an issue I've seen in my games. [*]On page 2, the actions/bonus actions/reactions lists are nice, though I'm confused about the placement and reading of "Attack" and "DC" (plus, is it redundant with the attack bonuses box?). I'm also not sure about the Cost/Freq column, as anything I can think of that would need that information would need a lot more space than that little line. [*]Also on page 2, the top row of stuff (speeds, spell slots, etc) is good, and the limited use abilities is good to have (I added that to my own character sheet variant), but I've found that limited use abilities need a lot more space than the little box would allow for. [*]Given the overflow for actions/bonus actions/reactions on page 3, it may be better to treat them as just belonging on page 3, and reconsider what you want to have on page 2. The section for weapon attacks and cantrips, in particular, seems sparse and poorly defined. [/LIST] [/QUOTE]

Verification