Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="vulcan_idic" data-source="post: 2686910" data-attributes="member: 19615">OK, but that's not at all what I meant.  What I was talking about what something I thought I read about somewhere of 0-level character classes...  i.e. so you could start playing a pre-first level *human* character.  The recommended usage was so you could play a group of characters who were quite young...  just taking their finals from wizard school or something.  An interesting idea, but I haven't used it yet.  Or maybe it was so you could start as both of two classes you were planning on multiclassing as...  Anyway, it seems like that could work here.  The LA +1 being the main level and just having the barest sketch of the class that will be there.  Then the second level would be the full first level of the character class.Edit: I skimmed those racial levels in the linked article and I really don't see where the brokenness comes in.  Especially for spellcasters - you still loose the caster levels, it looks just as balanced as starting at second level as a 1st level character of an LA +1 race, just having the benefits split up a bit so you can advance with other characters.  Sorry, I just don't see it.</blockquote>