Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Longshadow" data-source="post: 1698473" data-attributes="member: 19626">I liked Adventure! and I'm very snobby in my pulp tastes.&nbsp; It helped that I was already a big fan of the ST version.&nbsp; It did an OK version of 'porting in with the d20 ruleset, but, really, would have had to have done a pretty pisspoor job for me not to like it. <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/laugh.png"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":lol:" title="Laughing&nbsp; &nbsp; :lol:" data-shortname=":lol:" /> As for the Abbie d20.&nbsp; Ugh.&nbsp;&nbsp; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f641.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":(" title="Frown&nbsp; &nbsp; :("&nbsp; data-smilie="3"data-shortname=":(" /> I'm trying to think of something nice to say, but nothing comes to mind.&nbsp; I was a big Abbie ST fan, and I simply did NOT care for the way the d20 rules were done to treat the setting.&nbsp; Other people on the WW boards have said that they liked the serious powering down of the powers set, but I feel that it no longer represents the published setting.&nbsp; In order to make Adventure, Abberant, and Trinity work on the same power scale, Abbies must now be of ridiculuously high levels to represent even many of the characters that were middle of the road in the ST version.&nbsp; The &quot;name&quot; biggies need 60-70 levels to do (No, that wasn't a typo).&nbsp; Doesn't work for me.&nbsp; YMMV.Oh, well.&nbsp; I already came up with an M&amp;M version of Abbie, so I'll make due with that. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Longshadow, post: 1698473, member: 19626"] I liked Adventure! and I'm very snobby in my pulp tastes. It helped that I was already a big fan of the ST version. It did an OK version of 'porting in with the d20 ruleset, but, really, would have had to have done a pretty pisspoor job for me not to like it. :lol: As for the Abbie d20. Ugh. :( I'm trying to think of something nice to say, but nothing comes to mind. I was a big Abbie ST fan, and I simply did NOT care for the way the d20 rules were done to treat the setting. Other people on the WW boards have said that they liked the serious powering down of the powers set, but I feel that it no longer represents the published setting. In order to make Adventure, Abberant, and Trinity work on the same power scale, Abbies must now be of ridiculuously high levels to represent even many of the characters that were middle of the road in the ST version. The "name" biggies need 60-70 levels to do (No, that wasn't a typo). Doesn't work for me. YMMV. Oh, well. I already came up with an M&M version of Abbie, so I'll make due with that. ;) [/QUOTE]

Verification