Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Ability Checks - Should they be errata'd?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="babinro" data-source="post: 4495653" data-attributes="member: 67482"><p>Good points...I do agree that you could potentially severely hurt the fun of the game by having epic level characters stopped by seemingly simple obstacles like a jammed door. The party of 3.5 players will eventually be trying the game sometime next year when the current campaign is done...and I hope, like myself and my 4E players they can see the game for what it is, fun. </p><p></p><p>I also agree that granting the ability to take 20 can hurt the game's high level barrier intentions at times. It makes adamantine door almost 'typical' where it should be extrodinary. I suppose you could just continually make stronger materials which may not technically exist in the D&D world but have crazy break DC's for Epic characters that want to take 20. Personally, I think characters should be limited to passive checks of 10 as a minimum, with a d20 roll to try and be 'outstanding' or 'lucky' in better performing said task.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="babinro, post: 4495653, member: 67482"] Good points...I do agree that you could potentially severely hurt the fun of the game by having epic level characters stopped by seemingly simple obstacles like a jammed door. The party of 3.5 players will eventually be trying the game sometime next year when the current campaign is done...and I hope, like myself and my 4E players they can see the game for what it is, fun. I also agree that granting the ability to take 20 can hurt the game's high level barrier intentions at times. It makes adamantine door almost 'typical' where it should be extrodinary. I suppose you could just continually make stronger materials which may not technically exist in the D&D world but have crazy break DC's for Epic characters that want to take 20. Personally, I think characters should be limited to passive checks of 10 as a minimum, with a d20 roll to try and be 'outstanding' or 'lucky' in better performing said task. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Ability Checks - Should they be errata'd?
Top