Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Ability Score Increases (I've changed my mind.)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Malmuria" data-source="post: 8369770" data-attributes="member: 7030755"><p>I think it's best to let players determine the aptitudes they want for their characters, rather than provide a try to provide a mechanic (ASI) that models or simulates biological diversity. Because, that mechanic (like many in dnd) does a very poor job of actually modeling anything, and in the meantime introduces exclusionary language. For example, in 1e female characters had a strength cap. That mechanic quickly went away, wisely, because people wanted to bring badass female fighters to the table and not feel like they were being penalized by the supposed simulation in the rules. Maybe it rankled and broke the immersion for the simulationists, but it was better for the game. Somewhat similarly, maybe in your setting you want to have a high strength, low intelligence species, and you can work that out with your players. But that trope is harmful and affects the way some people are seen even in the current day, and is really just unnecessary to include in the base game. It doesn't have to be there in order for dnd to still be dnd.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Malmuria, post: 8369770, member: 7030755"] I think it's best to let players determine the aptitudes they want for their characters, rather than provide a try to provide a mechanic (ASI) that models or simulates biological diversity. Because, that mechanic (like many in dnd) does a very poor job of actually modeling anything, and in the meantime introduces exclusionary language. For example, in 1e female characters had a strength cap. That mechanic quickly went away, wisely, because people wanted to bring badass female fighters to the table and not feel like they were being penalized by the supposed simulation in the rules. Maybe it rankled and broke the immersion for the simulationists, but it was better for the game. Somewhat similarly, maybe in your setting you want to have a high strength, low intelligence species, and you can work that out with your players. But that trope is harmful and affects the way some people are seen even in the current day, and is really just unnecessary to include in the base game. It doesn't have to be there in order for dnd to still be dnd. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Ability Score Increases (I've changed my mind.)
Top