Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Ability Score Increases (I've changed my mind.)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chaosmancer" data-source="post: 8373168" data-attributes="member: 6801228"><p>Why can't an elf match a hobgoblin in endurance? </p><p></p><p>Besides, the entire point I was responding to was that these bonuses help define the race. But, if asked who the best archers are, I'm not going to say Kobolds, despite them having the same +2 Dex as Elves. Or goblins. Or halflings... so how is it the +2 Dex that makes Elves the best archers? </p><p></p><p>The entire system seems backwards to me, we declared them the best at something, gave them a +2, and now people are saying that the +2 means they are the best at something, but that's never how it worked. We never went and observed an elf in the wild to determine that they had a +2 and then determined that meant they were excellent archers.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So it is easier as a player to argue to break the rules (go from hard code to floating) than it is to argue to follow the rules? (Use floating to match the hard code)</p><p></p><p>Somehow, that doesn't seem to make sense.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Seems everyone forgets that</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You broke the quote in the wrong place. And again, you are conflating two things. </p><p></p><p></p><p>A goliath with a +2 strength is not lifting twice what a human lifts. A +2 strength is 60 lbs, that takes the goliath scale to (10-37) if you want to be technical. Powerful Build gives you a +0 strength, it is a completely separate ability, but is also would take a goliath who is identical to a human (ie does not have the +2 strength) and make their scale (16 - 72) </p><p></p><p>In other words, that +2 strength does not make Goliaths super strong. Powerful Build does that. The +2 Strength is nearly meaningless and clutching on and saying that the difference between (8-36) and (10-37) is super massive and defining is a head scratcher. It means nothing.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Then take away powerful build, the ability that actually lets them lift twice what a human can. Oh wait. Then you wouldn't have an argument. Because your argument is based on something that isn't true. </p><p></p><p>Loxodon get a +2 Con, +1 Wis, they can also lift twice what a human can because they have powerful build. The +2 strength doesn't apply at all. Or if it does, then Loxodon are supposed to also have a +2 strength.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No, it wasn't working for me.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Do me a favor. In forty years, check and see how many world records have been broken. Because I'm willing to bet that just like the previous 40 years, where we had achieved the top human performance and reached the peak of what was possible, that in 40 years time we'll have people breaking those records and setting a new standard for the peak of what is humanly possible. </p><p></p><p>And, again, my point was never that physiology has changed (though it does make you wonder how we keep finding world records broken every 3 to 5 years) but that it seems silly to say that something is utterly impossible. It was impossible yesterday for a man to lift as much as they can lift today, so why are so confident in saying that what men can lift today is impossible for a woman to lift tomorrow? Improbable? Sure. Impossible? I don't feel comfortable making that assertion.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chaosmancer, post: 8373168, member: 6801228"] Why can't an elf match a hobgoblin in endurance? Besides, the entire point I was responding to was that these bonuses help define the race. But, if asked who the best archers are, I'm not going to say Kobolds, despite them having the same +2 Dex as Elves. Or goblins. Or halflings... so how is it the +2 Dex that makes Elves the best archers? The entire system seems backwards to me, we declared them the best at something, gave them a +2, and now people are saying that the +2 means they are the best at something, but that's never how it worked. We never went and observed an elf in the wild to determine that they had a +2 and then determined that meant they were excellent archers. So it is easier as a player to argue to break the rules (go from hard code to floating) than it is to argue to follow the rules? (Use floating to match the hard code) Somehow, that doesn't seem to make sense. Seems everyone forgets that You broke the quote in the wrong place. And again, you are conflating two things. A goliath with a +2 strength is not lifting twice what a human lifts. A +2 strength is 60 lbs, that takes the goliath scale to (10-37) if you want to be technical. Powerful Build gives you a +0 strength, it is a completely separate ability, but is also would take a goliath who is identical to a human (ie does not have the +2 strength) and make their scale (16 - 72) In other words, that +2 strength does not make Goliaths super strong. Powerful Build does that. The +2 Strength is nearly meaningless and clutching on and saying that the difference between (8-36) and (10-37) is super massive and defining is a head scratcher. It means nothing. Then take away powerful build, the ability that actually lets them lift twice what a human can. Oh wait. Then you wouldn't have an argument. Because your argument is based on something that isn't true. Loxodon get a +2 Con, +1 Wis, they can also lift twice what a human can because they have powerful build. The +2 strength doesn't apply at all. Or if it does, then Loxodon are supposed to also have a +2 strength. No, it wasn't working for me. Do me a favor. In forty years, check and see how many world records have been broken. Because I'm willing to bet that just like the previous 40 years, where we had achieved the top human performance and reached the peak of what was possible, that in 40 years time we'll have people breaking those records and setting a new standard for the peak of what is humanly possible. And, again, my point was never that physiology has changed (though it does make you wonder how we keep finding world records broken every 3 to 5 years) but that it seems silly to say that something is utterly impossible. It was impossible yesterday for a man to lift as much as they can lift today, so why are so confident in saying that what men can lift today is impossible for a woman to lift tomorrow? Improbable? Sure. Impossible? I don't feel comfortable making that assertion. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Ability Score Increases (I've changed my mind.)
Top